chore: make lighthouse check more radical #1610
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
derberg
requested review from
mcturco,
akshatnema,
magicmatatjahu and
asyncapi-bot-eve
as code owners
✅ Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
|
⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:
Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-1610--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/ |
akshatnema
approved these changes
May 2, 2023
|
/rtm |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks to #1464 we have accessibility at really good level, 98% 💪🏼
what if we lock to these high values to make sure they stay like that forever and we do not have any regression in future? especially that I think in the past accessibility was high already by other contribution but then dropped again as we expected 70% quality only