-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add initial DX working group proposal #1088
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Fran Méndez <fmvilas@gmail.com>
My two cents: I'd not make any differentiations between founding members and members. I mean, once this PR is merged, y'all will be members in the same way and with the same responsibilities. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me 👍
I'm not a code owner so please wait until someone from them approves it.
Just to clarify: I meant all members will be the same. The only exception is the chairperson, of course. |
I'm happy to vote yes too! 🗳️ |
BTW, please remind me to create the |
/rtm |
Related to https://github.com/orgs/asyncapi/discussions/1037
In addition to @KhudaDad414, @peter-rr, and myself, I suggest additional founding members (please vote by 👍 if you want to join as a funding member)
I propose myself as the chairperson (Rotating role) unless there are any objections, I'll be accountable and responsible for the following:
Expectations of founding members & members
Requirement to join as a member