Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for #2553: incorrect keyword in ALMA doc example #2554

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2022

Conversation

keflavich
Copy link
Contributor

obs_id no longer refers to the member_ous_uid that is the unique identifier of a data set, so you need to use the latter keyword now.

This is a fix for an upstream change that caused #2553

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 6, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #2554 (796a9ec) into main (f74e7c0) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2554   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.97%   63.97%           
=======================================
  Files         132      132           
  Lines       16984    16984           
=======================================
  Hits        10866    10866           
  Misses       6118     6118           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@bsipocz bsipocz merged commit 5af5780 into astropy:main Oct 7, 2022
@bsipocz
Copy link
Member

bsipocz commented Oct 7, 2022

Thanks @keflavich!

@andamian
Copy link

andamian commented Oct 7, 2022

Yes, that was as a result of the last round of service updates. Just missed this update in the docs. Thanks for the fix @keflavich

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DOC: alma.get_data_info() function does not take 'obs_id' argument
3 participants