Documentation mismatch between ruff and docs for f-string-in-exception

[UriyaHarpeness]

This is a documentation issue, not related to the logic.
This issue is relevant for the current version: 0.5.4.

In https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/f-string-in-exception/ there's a section that shows the traceback before and after, in the after one it does not include the first line of the traceback.

I wanted to open a PR to add the missing line, but when opening the code docstrings it seemed to already include that line:

ruff/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_errmsg/rules/string_in_exception.rs

Lines 43 to 48 in 2ce3e3a

	/// Which will produce a traceback like:
	/// ```console
	/// Traceback (most recent call last):
	/// File "tmp.py", line 3, in <module>
	/// raise RuntimeError(msg)
	/// RuntimeError: 'Some value' is incorrect

I went to the docs repo, and there the first line was missing:
https://github.com/astral-sh/docs/blob/main/site/ruff/rules/f-string-in-exception/index.html#L827-L830

I don't know what the source of this mismatch is, but seemed that just opening a manual change to the generated docs is not the way to go. So here I am opening an issue.

[dhruvmanila]

I think it's the other rule (in the same file) which has a missing traceback header ;)

ruff/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_errmsg/rules/string_in_exception.rs

Lines 98 to 102 in 2ce3e3a

	/// Which will produce a traceback like:
	/// ```console
	/// File "tmp.py", line 3, in <module>
	/// raise RuntimeError(msg)
	/// RuntimeError: 'Some value' is incorrect

[UriyaHarpeness]

Sigh... my bad, I'll open a PR soon.
Thanks.

[charliermarsh]

Closed by #12508.