Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Docs for predictive functions #468

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2024

Conversation

rohanbabbar04
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Checklist

  • Code style is correct (follows pylint and black guidelines)
  • Includes new or updated tests to cover the new feature
  • New features are properly documented (with an example if appropriate)
  • Includes a sample plot to visually illustrate the changes (only for plot-related functions)
  • Widget states have been properly saved (only for notebooks with widgets) see for details.

@rohanbabbar04 rohanbabbar04 changed the title Improve Docs for functions Improve Docs for predictive functions Jun 15, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.35%. Comparing base (cd776ae) to head (4db5f13).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #468      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.74%   82.35%   +1.61%     
==========================================
  Files          92       96       +4     
  Lines        7556     7896     +340     
==========================================
+ Hits         6101     6503     +402     
+ Misses       1455     1393      -62     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@OriolAbril
Copy link
Member

@aloctavodia aloctavodia merged commit 82c03fd into arviz-devs:main Jun 15, 2024
4 checks passed
@aloctavodia
Copy link
Contributor

Oops, I merge this by mistake. You can modify the rest in a separated PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants