Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(controller): resync replicaset if spec.replicas differs #3880

Closed

Conversation

chicocvenancio
Copy link

@chicocvenancio chicocvenancio commented Oct 8, 2024

Checklist:

  • Either (a) I've created an enhancement proposal and discussed it with the community, (b) this is a bug fix, or (c) this is a chore.
  • The title of the PR is (a) conventional with a list of types and scopes found here, (b) states what changed, and (c) suffixes the related issues number. E.g. "fix(controller): Updates such and such. Fixes #1234".
  • I've signed my commits with DCO
  • I have written unit and/or e2e tests for my change. PRs without these are unlikely to be merged.
  • My builds are green. Try syncing with master if they are not.
  • My organization is added to USERS.md.

Signed-off-by: Chico Venancio <francisco@argyle.com>
@chicocvenancio
Copy link
Author

chicocvenancio commented Oct 8, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Published E2E Test Results

  4 files    4 suites   3h 14m 37s ⏱️
113 tests 104 ✅  7 💤 2 ❌
456 runs  424 ✅ 28 💤 4 ❌

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit f3a804f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Published Unit Test Results

2 275 tests   2 275 ✅  2m 58s ⏱️
  128 suites      0 💤
    1 files        0 ❌

Results for commit f3a804f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Signed-off-by: Chico Venancio <francisco@argyle.com>
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.87%. Comparing base (50300e5) to head (f3a804f).
Report is 80 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3880      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.88%   83.87%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         163      163              
  Lines       18564    18564              
==========================================
- Hits        15573    15571       -2     
- Misses       2119     2120       +1     
- Partials      872      873       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@chicocvenancio chicocvenancio deleted the replicaset-update branch October 16, 2024 15:17
@jangeja
Copy link

jangeja commented Nov 10, 2024

@chicocvenancio any reason why this was closed and not merged in? I'm having the same issue with rollouts currently. Intermittent degraded health for replicasets

@chicocvenancio
Copy link
Author

@jangeja I closed it because it doesn't work, this fixes some tests I wrote, but only because unlike k8s api the tests do not properly fill resourceVersion.

f2e1300 is my current hope in getting this properly fixed, we have it running without issue. I still need to clean it up further and write some tests for it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants