Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Btrfs: fix deadlock between clone/dedupe and rename
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
commit 4ea748e upstream.

Reflinking (clone/dedupe) and rename are operations that operate on two
inodes and therefore need to lock them in the same order to avoid ABBA
deadlocks. It happens that Btrfs' reflink implementation always locked
them in a different order from VFS's lock_two_nondirectories() helper,
which is used by the rename code in VFS, resulting in ABBA type deadlocks.

Btrfs' locking order:

  static void btrfs_double_inode_lock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
  {
         if (inode1 < inode2)
                swap(inode1, inode2);

         inode_lock_nested(inode1, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
         inode_lock_nested(inode2, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
  }

VFS's locking order:

  void lock_two_nondirectories(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
  {
        if (inode1 > inode2)
                swap(inode1, inode2);

        if (inode1 && !S_ISDIR(inode1->i_mode))
                inode_lock(inode1);
        if (inode2 && !S_ISDIR(inode2->i_mode) && inode2 != inode1)
                inode_lock_nested(inode2, I_MUTEX_NONDIR2);
}

Fix this by killing the btrfs helper function that does the double inode
locking and replace it with VFS's helper lock_two_nondirectories().

Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Fixes: 416161d ("btrfs: offline dedupe")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
  • Loading branch information
fdmanana authored and gregkh committed Mar 23, 2019
1 parent 3486142 commit 1098803
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 18 deletions.
21 changes: 3 additions & 18 deletions fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3206,21 +3206,6 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_dev_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
return ret;
}

static void btrfs_double_inode_unlock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
{
inode_unlock(inode1);
inode_unlock(inode2);
}

static void btrfs_double_inode_lock(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
{
if (inode1 < inode2)
swap(inode1, inode2);

inode_lock_nested(inode1, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
inode_lock_nested(inode2, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
}

static void btrfs_double_extent_unlock(struct inode *inode1, u64 loff1,
struct inode *inode2, u64 loff2, u64 len)
{
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3989,7 +3974,7 @@ static int btrfs_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
if (same_inode)
inode_lock(inode_in);
else
btrfs_double_inode_lock(inode_in, inode_out);
lock_two_nondirectories(inode_in, inode_out);

/*
* Now that the inodes are locked, we need to start writeback ourselves
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4039,7 +4024,7 @@ static int btrfs_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
if (same_inode)
inode_unlock(inode_in);
else
btrfs_double_inode_unlock(inode_in, inode_out);
unlock_two_nondirectories(inode_in, inode_out);

return ret;
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4069,7 +4054,7 @@ loff_t btrfs_remap_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t off,
if (same_inode)
inode_unlock(src_inode);
else
btrfs_double_inode_unlock(src_inode, dst_inode);
unlock_two_nondirectories(src_inode, dst_inode);

return ret < 0 ? ret : len;
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 1098803

Please sign in to comment.