You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am in the process of looking for a nice guard clause library using the newer feature of CallerArgumentExpressionAttribute.
It almost seemed I found it here. When I did my first tests on our current .NET 8 environment it looked perfect.
But today I started exchanging our old library with this one in one of our older solutions. Sadly for some reasons we cannot move this one away from .NET Framework. To my surprise suddenly all method signatures looked different.
My goal for our team is always to keep the differences among the solutions as small as possible. So a Guard Clause library working different is a no go.
Is there any particular reason why you are holding back this feature?
I mean all you have to do is add this to your project:
If you accept it, there is then the question, if it is worth to have a special netstandard 2.1 version. As every .net version that can use 2.1 also can use 2.0. But I did not want to make more changes then necessary in a single pull request.
I am in the process of looking for a nice guard clause library using the newer feature of CallerArgumentExpressionAttribute.
It almost seemed I found it here. When I did my first tests on our current .NET 8 environment it looked perfect.
But today I started exchanging our old library with this one in one of our older solutions. Sadly for some reasons we cannot move this one away from .NET Framework. To my surprise suddenly all method signatures looked different.
My goal for our team is always to keep the differences among the solutions as small as possible. So a Guard Clause library working different is a no go.
Is there any particular reason why you are holding back this feature?
I mean all you have to do is add this to your project:
and voila it works on older platforms.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: