Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs review #72

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 27, 2020
Merged

Docs review #72

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 27, 2020

Conversation

0xGabi
Copy link
Contributor

@0xGabi 0xGabi commented Jun 24, 2020

Note I did a first commit where I included lint to the markdown files. The actual documentation changes are on this commit: 3a32151

@0xGabi 0xGabi requested review from bpierre and eternauta1337 June 24, 2020 00:33
| `ConnectionError` | Gets thrown if the connection fails. |
| Type | Description |
| :--------------------- | :----------------------------------------------------- |
| `ConnectionError` | Gets thrown if the connection fails. |
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't have support for Errors yet. Should we include a quick PR to include them or remove this from the documentation for now?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we could try to add proper errors (I am thinking in particular about OrganizationNotFound which is very common), and we could remove them just before releasing if we are not ready.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree we should include at least a handler for OrganizationNotFound . But let's do it in a different PR.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 24, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #72 into master will decrease coverage by 0.10%.
The diff coverage is 30.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #72      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   29.10%   28.99%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          53       53              
  Lines         835      838       +3     
  Branches      135      137       +2     
==========================================
  Hits          243      243              
- Misses        592      595       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
#unittests 28.99% <30.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/connect-core/src/entities/Application.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/connect-core/src/entities/Repository.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/connect-core/src/entities/Role.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...kages/connect-core/src/utils/path/calculatePath.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/connect-thegraph/src/parsers/repos.ts 92.30% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c52eb92...3b411c5. Read the comment docs.

@@ -8,149 +8,149 @@ An `Organization` instance represents an Aragon organization and allows to inter

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We still don't have support for several of the API methods on this document. Should we remove them from the docs now?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure yes, we could have these in a next branch maybe? That branch would contain any code or documentation that is not ready to be released yet.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this still necessary with our current GitBook setup?

I will go ahead and give a stab to include the few API methods we miss. I believe we already have all the logic we need.

SUMMARY.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SUMMARY.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -8,149 +8,149 @@ An `Organization` instance represents an Aragon organization and allows to inter

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure yes, we could have these in a next branch maybe? That branch would contain any code or documentation that is not ready to be released yet.

api-reference/organization.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api-reference/repository.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api-reference/role.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api-reference/transaction-intent.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api-reference/transaction-intent.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/connect-core/src/entities/Role.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SUMMARY.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SUMMARY.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@0xGabi 0xGabi merged commit 153ac93 into master Jun 27, 2020
@0xGabi 0xGabi deleted the docs-review branch June 27, 2020 21:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants