Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Response view not passing error to support #38579

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

hetunandu
Copy link
Member

@hetunandu hetunandu commented Jan 10, 2025

Description

Make sure the error message is passing to the Log helper so that it can relay it to Appsmith support when invoked

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12708128489
Commit: 585747d
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.Sanity
Spec:


Fri, 10 Jan 2025 11:37:58 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error logging by adding more detailed error message information to the LogHelper component.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a minor enhancement to the ErrorView component in the Plugin Action Editor. Specifically, a new message property is added to the LogHelper component, allowing it to receive a formatted error message string. This change aims to improve error logging by providing more detailed error information within the component.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/.../ErrorView/ErrorView.tsx Added message={${errorMessage}} prop to LogHelper component

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Bug, ok-to-test

Suggested reviewers

  • albinAppsmith
  • ankitakinger

Poem

🐛 In the realm of code, an error takes flight
A message so clear, bringing logs to light
LogHelper whispers the tale untold
Of bugs that once were hidden, now bold
A small change sparks debugging delight! 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@hetunandu hetunandu added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Jan 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Bug Something isn't working label Jan 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/components/Response/components/ErrorView/ErrorView.tsx (1)

Line range hint 85-91: Consider template literal usage.

Since you're using template literal syntax but not performing any string interpolation, you could simplify this to:

-            message={`${errorMessage}`}
+            message={errorMessage}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 88-88: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1030275 and 585747d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/components/Response/components/ErrorView/ErrorView.tsx (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / rts-build / build
  • GitHub Check: client-check-cyclic-deps / check-cyclic-dependencies
  • GitHub Check: client-build / client-build
  • GitHub Check: client-prettier / prettier-check
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/components/Response/components/ErrorView/ErrorView.tsx (2)

85-85: LGTM! Good addition for improved error reporting.

The addition of the message prop to LogHelper enhances error reporting capabilities.


Line range hint 84-91: Verify error message handling for edge cases.

Ensure that LogHelper properly handles cases where errorMessage might be undefined or null.

✅ Verification successful

Error handling is properly implemented

The LogHelper component and its usage demonstrate proper error handling through TypeScript's type safety, optional props, and fallback values. The error message is safely handled at multiple levels, including the parent component's conditional rendering.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for null checks on errorMessage in the codebase
rg "errorMessage\s*(?:\?\?|&&|\|\||!=\s*null|!==\s*null)" --type ts

Length of output: 1135


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for LogHelper implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const LogHelper = $_' || ast-grep --pattern 'class LogHelper $_'

# Backup search using ripgrep
rg "LogHelper.*=.*{" -A 10 --type ts

Length of output: 76647


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for LogHelper imports and usage
rg "import.*LogHelper" --type ts
rg "LogHelper.*{" -A 5 --type ts

Length of output: 498


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for LogHelper implementation using the specific path
cat app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/ErrorLogs/components/LogHelper.tsx || cat app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/ErrorLogs/components/LogHelper.ts

# Backup search for the file
fd LogHelper.ts -t f

Length of output: 2004

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 88-88: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

@hetunandu hetunandu enabled auto-merge (squash) January 10, 2025 11:31
@hetunandu hetunandu disabled auto-merge January 10, 2025 11:31
@hetunandu hetunandu enabled auto-merge (squash) January 10, 2025 11:32
@hetunandu hetunandu merged commit 5a17a7f into release Jan 10, 2025
47 checks passed
@hetunandu hetunandu deleted the chore/response-view-debug-changes branch January 10, 2025 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something isn't working ok-to-test Required label for CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants