chore: Add step to place server artifacts for package-master stage
#36513
Conversation
WalkthroughA new step named "Place server artifacts-es" has been introduced in the GitHub Actions workflow located in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
skip-changelog
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| - name: Place server artifacts-es | ||
| run: | | ||
| if [[ -f scripts/prepare_server_artifacts.sh ]]; then | ||
| scripts/prepare_server_artifacts.sh | ||
| fi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Excellent addition of the "Place server artifacts-es" step to our workflow!
After examining the prepare_server_artifacts.sh script, it's evident that this step is crucial for setting up the necessary server artifacts before building the Docker image. The script efficiently handles the copying and organization of essential files, ensuring the build process has all required components.
However, it appears that both the package-release and package-master jobs include this step. To enhance our workflow's maintainability and adhere to DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles, we should consider creating a reusable workflow step for placing server artifacts. This approach will streamline our configuration and make future updates more manageable.
Recommendation:
- Refactor the "Place server artifacts-es" step into a reusable workflow component.
- Ensure both
package-releaseandpackage-masterjobs utilize this reusable step to eliminate duplication.
Analysis chain
Class, let's examine this new step in our workflow.
Now, pay attention to this new addition. We have a step called "Place server artifacts-es" that runs a shell script if it exists. This is an important part of our lesson on continuous integration.
Let's break it down:
- The step checks if a script called
prepare_server_artifacts.shexists in thescriptsdirectory. - If the script exists, it runs it.
This step is crucial for preparing our server artifacts before we build our Docker image. It's like packing your backpack before a field trip - we want to make sure we have everything we need!
However, class, I have a few questions for you to ponder:
- What exactly does the
prepare_server_artifacts.shscript do? We should document its purpose and functionality. - Is this step necessary for both the
package-releaseandpackage-masterjobs? If so, we might want to consider creating a reusable workflow step to avoid duplication.
Let's run a quick check to see if we can find this script and learn more about it:
Remember, class, always document your work clearly. It helps your fellow students (or in this case, developers) understand what's happening in the workflow.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the existence and content of the prepare_server_artifacts.sh script
# Check if the script exists
if [ -f scripts/prepare_server_artifacts.sh ]; then
echo "The prepare_server_artifacts.sh script exists."
echo "Here's what it contains:"
cat scripts/prepare_server_artifacts.sh
else
echo "The prepare_server_artifacts.sh script does not exist in the scripts directory."
fi
Length of output: 1090
…36513) ## Description > [!TIP] > _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._ > > _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._ Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No (cherry picked from commit 368fdac)
…ppsmithorg#36513) ## Description > [!TIP] > _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._ > > _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._ Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No
Description
Tip
Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).
Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.
Fixes #
Issue Numberor
Fixes
Issue URLWarning
If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.
Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
🔍 Cypress test results
Caution
If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit