Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Governance - clarify yes/no vote #1041

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2020

Conversation

Scottmitch
Copy link
Member

Motivation:
The Governance doc included provisions for voting on a new Maintainer
that required binary yes/no voting. This provision should have been put
in the Decision-Making and Voting section as it applies to all votes.

Modifications:

  • Move yes/no vote requirements to the Decision-Making and Voting
    section

Result:
Governance general voting clarified as binary yes/no.

Motivation:
The Governance doc included provisions for voting on a new Maintainer
that required binary yes/no voting. This provision should have been put
in the Decision-Making and Voting section as it applies to all votes.

Modifications:
- Move yes/no vote requirements to the Decision-Making and Voting
section

Result:
Governance general voting clarified as binary yes/no.
Copy link
Member

@idelpivnitskiy idelpivnitskiy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@Scottmitch Scottmitch merged commit 1b41a01 into apple:master May 6, 2020
@Scottmitch Scottmitch deleted the govern_vote_clarify branch May 6, 2020 01:07
NiteshKant pushed a commit to NiteshKant/servicetalk that referenced this pull request May 6, 2020
Motivation:
The Governance doc included provisions for voting on a new Maintainer
that required binary yes/no voting. This provision should have been put
in the Decision-Making and Voting section as it applies to all votes.

Modifications:
- Move yes/no vote requirements to the Decision-Making and Voting
section

Result:
Governance general voting clarified as binary yes/no.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants