-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 275
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
set up cargo-deny #89
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a847548
set up cargo-deny
o0Ignition0o e50d855
wip
o0Ignition0o b5fa2c3
trying to bump dependencies and have cargo-deny understand the licens…
o0Ignition0o fdc3873
YES FINALLY \o/
o0Ignition0o 0101a57
Merge branch 'main' into igni/cargo_deny
o0Ignition0o e68a710
Merge branch 'main' into igni/cargo_deny
o0Ignition0o 9fcb95f
wip
o0Ignition0o 1b99d6d
update deny.toml supported versions for apollo-router and apollo-rout…
o0Ignition0o File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
check, lint.... 🤔 should it really be 2 different commands?
I think we should keep
lint
and move your check there. You can exclude windows from the test there too using#[cfg(not(windows))]
.Check would be fine too if it didn't collide with "cargo check" which means checking if it compiles, not linting. (counter intuitive for rust developers)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It can indeed be a bit confusing! Let's try to think of a name that conveys we're making sure the codebase complies to our standards, license and fmt and stylewise.
wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at #147 and this, i think this calls for a team discussion about what xtask does and what the CI does. I'm opening an issue or maybe a discussion ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just opened #160 so we dont forget about it!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Purrfect 😸