Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Bug Fix: FieldName Normalization/Denormalization & @export(as:) concurrency issue #84

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 27, 2018

Conversation

Calling `fieldNameNormalizer` ourselves before letting the response escape our hands is safer, as apollo-client can't mangle it then.

Fixes: #81
Also fixes: `fieldNameNormalizer`/`Denormalizer` test-cases had some bugs.
@fbartho fbartho changed the title Fix FieldName Normalization/Denormalization & @export(as:) concurrency issue. 🐛 Bug Fix: FieldName Normalization/Denormalization & @export(as:) concurrency issue Feb 26, 2018
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 26, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #84 into master will decrease coverage by 0.88%.
The diff coverage is 93.75%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #84      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.43%   90.55%   -0.89%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         257      254       -3     
  Branches       81       79       -2     
==========================================
- Hits          235      230       -5     
- Misses         18       20       +2     
  Partials        4        4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/restLink.ts 90.51% <93.75%> (-0.9%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 408abea...a500b6c. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants