Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LLVM][WINDOWS] Recover windows support for the latest LLVM #6698

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2020

Conversation

tqchen
Copy link
Member

@tqchen tqchen commented Oct 16, 2020

Windows COFF requires comdat information to support weak-like linkage(via any).
This patch fixes the windows LLVM support after LLVM-8.

@tqchen
Copy link
Member Author

tqchen commented Oct 16, 2020

cc @tmoreau89 @rkimball

Windows COFF requires comdat information to support weak-like linkage(via any).
This patch fixes the windows LLVM support after LLVM-8.
@rkimball
Copy link
Contributor

I tested with llvm 11.0 release and this PR and my failing unit test now passes. Thank you @tqchen for this.

@jroesch jroesch merged commit 461e75b into apache:main Oct 16, 2020
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2020
)

Windows COFF requires comdat information to support weak-like linkage(via any).
This patch fixes the windows LLVM support after LLVM-8.
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2020
)

Windows COFF requires comdat information to support weak-like linkage(via any).
This patch fixes the windows LLVM support after LLVM-8.
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2020
)

Windows COFF requires comdat information to support weak-like linkage(via any).
This patch fixes the windows LLVM support after LLVM-8.
trevor-m pushed a commit to neo-ai/tvm that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2020
)

Windows COFF requires comdat information to support weak-like linkage(via any).
This patch fixes the windows LLVM support after LLVM-8.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants