Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SPARK-6397][SQL] Check the missingInput simply #5132

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-6397][SQL] Check the missingInput simply #5132

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

watermen
Copy link
Contributor

@watermen watermen force-pushed the sql-missingInput-new branch from 705c684 to 1e5bdc5 Compare March 23, 2015 07:20
@liancheng
Copy link
Contributor

ok to test

@liancheng
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM pending Jenkins.

@liancheng liancheng mentioned this pull request Mar 23, 2015
Closed
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 23, 2015

Test build #28984 has finished for PR 5132 at commit 1e5bdc5.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@watermen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@liancheng

@liancheng
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, merging to master and branch-1.3.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2015
@watermen @liancheng
[SPARK-6397][SQL] Check the missingInput simply
a29f493 
#5082

/cc liancheng

Author: Yadong Qi <qiyadong2010@gmail.com>

Closes #5132 from watermen/sql-missingInput-new and squashes the following commits:

1e5bdc5 [Yadong Qi] Check the missingInput simply

(cherry picked from commit 9f3273b)
Signed-off-by: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 9f3273b Mar 23, 2015
@liancheng liancheng mentioned this pull request Mar 23, 2015
Closed
@watermen watermen deleted the sql-missingInput-new branch April 21, 2015 03:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@watermen @liancheng @SparkQA