-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-41962][MINOR][SQL] Update the order of imports in class SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase #39906
Conversation
import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting; | ||
import org.apache.parquet.VersionParser; | ||
import org.apache.parquet.VersionParser.ParsedVersion; | ||
import org.apache.parquet.column.page.PageReadStore; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we fix dev/checkstyle.xml
to enforce this order?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, that's better, and once and for all. I'll make some changes later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Merged to master, branch-3.4, branch-3.3 and branch-3.2. |
…icParquetRecordReaderBase ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Update the order of imports in class SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase. ### Why are the changes needed? Follow the code style. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Passed GA. Closes #39906 from wayneguow/import. Authored-by: wayneguow <guow93@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit d6134f7) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
…icParquetRecordReaderBase ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Update the order of imports in class SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase. ### Why are the changes needed? Follow the code style. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Passed GA. Closes #39906 from wayneguow/import. Authored-by: wayneguow <guow93@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit d6134f7) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
…icParquetRecordReaderBase ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Update the order of imports in class SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase. ### Why are the changes needed? Follow the code style. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Passed GA. Closes #39906 from wayneguow/import. Authored-by: wayneguow <guow93@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit d6134f7) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Hi, @wayneguow and @HyukjinKwon This broke branch-3.2.
|
I reverted the commit from |
@dongjoon-hyun Thank you for resolving it. |
You can make a new backporting PR to branch-3.2 if needed, @wayneguow . |
Also, cc @parthchandra for branch-3.2 |
It seems that it is ok without those unordered imports in branch-3.2, so just reverting this for branch-3.2 is enough. |
Thank you for the confirmation, @wayneguow . |
…icParquetRecordReaderBase ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Update the order of imports in class SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase. ### Why are the changes needed? Follow the code style. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Passed GA. Closes apache#39906 from wayneguow/import. Authored-by: wayneguow <guow93@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit d6134f7) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update the order of imports in class SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.
Why are the changes needed?
Follow the code style.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
Passed GA.