Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-38959][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Address feedback for RowLevelOperationRuntimeGroupFiltering #38526

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

aokolnychyi
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is to address the feedback on PR #36304 after that change was merged.

Why are the changes needed?

These changes are needed for better code quality.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the SQL label Nov 6, 2022
@aokolnychyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cloud-fan, could you take a look to see if that's what you meant in PR #36304?

There is also one open question here.

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

thanks, merging to master!

@cloud-fan cloud-fan closed this in 7429223 Nov 8, 2022
@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

For the open question, I'm addressing it in #38557

SandishKumarHN pushed a commit to SandishKumarHN/spark that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2022
…untimeGroupFiltering

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is to address the feedback on PR apache#36304 after that change was merged.

### Why are the changes needed?

These changes are needed for better code quality.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Closes apache#38526 from aokolnychyi/spark-38959-follow-up.

Authored-by: aokolnychyi <aokolnychyi@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants