-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-25274][PYTHON][SQL] In toPandas with Arrow send un-ordered record batches to improve performance #22275
Closed
BryanCutler
wants to merge
10
commits into
apache:master
from
BryanCutler:arrow-toPandas-oo-batches-SPARK-25274
Closed
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
087564e
changed toPandas to send out of order batches, followed by batch orde…
BryanCutler 6073ed9
reorg the batch order deser to simplify
BryanCutler 0d77b00
expanded test for more cases
BryanCutler 7d19977
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into arrow-toPandas-oo…
BryanCutler 6457e42
remove blank line
BryanCutler bf2feec
add test case with delay
BryanCutler 725cd47
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into arrow-toPandas-oo…
BryanCutler 7dc92c8
fixed some comments
BryanCutler 8045fac
fix comment
BryanCutler 00c7b8c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into arrow-toPandas-oo…
BryanCutler File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@holdenk and @felixcheung , I didn't do a loop but chose some different levels of partition numbers to be a bit more sure that partitions won't end up in order. I also added some other cases of different partition/batch ratios. Let me know if you think we need more to be sure here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see how we're guaranteeing out-of-order from the JVM. Could we delay on one of the early partitions to guarantee out of order?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah it's not a guarantee, but with a large num of partitions, it's a pretty slim chance they will all be in order. I can also add a case with some delay. My only concern is how big to make the delay to be sure it's enough without adding wasted time to the tests.
How about we keep the case with a large number of partitions and add a case with 100ms delay on the first partition?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@holdenk , I updated the tests, please take another look when you get a chance. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the new tests, I think 0.1 on one of partitions is enough.