apidoc master branch links fix #5755
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ebarboni
added
the
JavaDoc
mbien
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2023
ebarboni
force-pushed
the
apidocsainitizephase2
branch
from
433aa70 to
b96dbbd
Compare
|
merging maybe it will need a final works on a release build. Master build has all the javadoc build this was easy. |
|
the master build show some remaining error on jenkins because javadoc should be build with jdk 20 or 19 (the one that match what we support) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
phase 2 of the apidoc .
This is part of #4450.
using the following to have ant javadoc -Dmetabuild.branch=master -Dapidocfullcheck=true.
Normaly build is apidoc error clean for master build (no idea yet for limited "release")
link to github file instead former mercurial
@link may be changed to @code as some item are protected and not public.
Hope this is enough.