Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KAFKA-15045: (KIP-924 pt. 13) AssignmentError calculation added #16114
KAFKA-15045: (KIP-924 pt. 13) AssignmentError calculation added #16114
Changes from all commits
11420e6
853c9d3
240cedd
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be nice to include the ProcessId of both clients. We'll need to change
activeTasksInOutput
into a Map<TaskId, ProcessId> so we can look up the other ProcessId, then do something like this:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: we should include the client id as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here, would be nice to log which client it was assigned to (which means turning
standbyTasksInOutput
into a Map<TaskId, ProcessId> as well). Then:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit (clarify "KafkaStreams client" since "client" as a term is so massively overloaded):
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, changing the
ApplicationState#allTasks
method to return aMap<TaskId, TaskInfo>
map would let us simplify this as well. Let's make that change, I'll update the KIP.Then we can remove this line altogether and move the
if (!applicationState.allTasks().containsKey(task.id())) --> return AssignmentError.UNKNOWN_TASK_ID;
inside the single loop I outlined in a comment aboveThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.