Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-33678][streaming-java] Remove StateBackend related public API. #25269

Conversation

JunRuiLee
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

[FLINK-33678][streaming-java] Remove StateBackend related public API.

Verifying this change

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (yes / no)
  • The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

@JunRuiLee JunRuiLee marked this pull request as draft August 30, 2024 02:34
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Aug 30, 2024

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@JunRuiLee JunRuiLee force-pushed the FLINK-33678-restart-storage-statebackend branch 9 times, most recently from a186daa to de8a928 Compare September 2, 2024 03:01
@JunRuiLee JunRuiLee force-pushed the FLINK-33678-restart-storage-statebackend branch from de8a928 to d1ef0ed Compare September 2, 2024 05:35
@JunRuiLee JunRuiLee closed this Sep 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants