Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[fix](variant) fix index in variant (#43375) #43773

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

[fix](variant) fix index in variant (#43375) #43773

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

csun5285
Copy link
Contributor

pick from master (#43375)

@csun5285
[fix](variant) fix index in variant (apache#43375)
91fa0a6 
### What problem does this PR solve?
Problem Summary:

1. Fixing error checks,
`InvertedIndexColumnWriter::check_support_inverted_index`, It is not
appropriate to determine support for other indexes by checking the
inverted index.
2. Fix `TableSchema::update_index()`

Co-authored-by: csun5285 <sunchenyang@selectdb.com>
@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@csun5285
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

github-actions[bot]
github-actions bot reviewed Nov 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

airborne12
airborne12 approved these changes Nov 13, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@airborne12 airborne12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Nov 13, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@airborne12 airborne12 merged commit 27e0051 into apache:branch-3.0 Nov 13, 2024
23 of 26 checks passed
@gavinchou gavinchou mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@github-actions github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] left review comments

@airborne12 airborne12 airborne12 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@csun5285 @doris-robot @airborne12