Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a note discouraging new use of dialect_of macro #1448

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Sep 29, 2024

@samuelcolvin has brought up the idea of standardizing on one pattern for different Dialect parsing behavior

I don't have the ambition to try and change the existing code, but we can encourage new contributions to follow the preferred behavior with some comments.

cc @iffyio @tobyhede and @lovasoa

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11091879275

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 89.312%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 11091827229: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 29925
Relevant Lines: 33506

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Contributor

@lovasoa lovasoa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good idea!

@alamb alamb merged commit ce2686a into apache:main Sep 30, 2024
10 checks passed
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Sep 30, 2024

Thanks for the review!

@alamb alamb deleted the alamb/dialect_if branch September 30, 2024 11:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants