Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.gitignore add package-lock.json #626

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2019

Conversation

brodycj
Copy link

@brodycj brodycj commented Jan 17, 2019

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 18, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #626 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #626   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.66%   64.66%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        1817     1817           
=======================================
  Hits         1175     1175           
  Misses        642      642

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d9c08f1...c966d09. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@erisu erisu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Though I still in favor and prefer committing the package-lock.json to GH instead, there is no harm doing this in the meantime.

We can always come back and remove anytime after a decision is made on the open discussion about package-lock.json for all repos.

Also this type of change exists on other various repos of ours.

👍

@brodycj brodycj merged commit 7a98708 into apache:master Jan 18, 2019
@brodycj brodycj deleted the git-ignore-package-lock branch January 18, 2019 00:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants