Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CELEBORN-1789][DOC] Document on Java Columnar Shuffle #3010

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

kerwin-zk
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Introduction to Celeborn's Java Columnar Shuffle

Why are the changes needed?

Introduction to Celeborn's Java Columnar Shuffle

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

CI

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 33.01%. Comparing base (4aabe37) to head (c058f3e).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3010      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   32.88%   33.01%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         331      331              
  Lines       19800    19842      +42     
  Branches     1780     1787       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         6510     6548      +38     
- Misses      12929    12931       +2     
- Partials      361      363       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@FMX FMX left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks. Merged into main(v0.6.0).

@FMX FMX closed this in 4b60dae Dec 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants