GH-43969: [CI][Dev] Prune .dockerignore #43971
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pitrou
force-pushed
the
gh43969-dockerignore
branch
from
c9078bc
to
f3c8790
Compare
|
|
pitrou
force-pushed
the
gh43969-dockerignore
branch
from
fae41d1
to
1cf73ad
Compare
|
@github-actions crossbow submit -g nightly-tests |
|
Revision: 1cf73ad Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-391261a90b
|
pitrou
requested review from
raulcd,
assignUser,
jonkeane and
kou
as code owners
|
@kou @assignUser Could one of you take a look at this? |
|
@github-actions crossbow submit -g nightly-packaging |
|
Revision: 1cf73ad Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-e95f93017a
|
github-actions
bot
added
awaiting merge
|
@github-actions crossbow submit -g nightly-release |
|
Revision: 1cf73ad Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-ef6ba6a207
|
|
CI failures look unrelated |
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 7a24729. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 5 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
zanmato1984
pushed a commit
to zanmato1984/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2024
### Rationale for this change The smaller the better, according to https://docs.docker.com/build/cache/optimize/ ### What changes are included in this PR? Prune obsolete or unnecessary inclusions from `.dockerignore`. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, by CI. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * GitHub Issue: apache#43969 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
khwilson
pushed a commit
to khwilson/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2024
### Rationale for this change The smaller the better, according to https://docs.docker.com/build/cache/optimize/ ### What changes are included in this PR? Prune obsolete or unnecessary inclusions from `.dockerignore`. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, by CI. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * GitHub Issue: apache#43969 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
The smaller the better, according to https://docs.docker.com/build/cache/optimize/
What changes are included in this PR?
Prune obsolete or unnecessary inclusions from
.dockerignore.Are these changes tested?
Yes, by CI.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.