Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Java] Update Unit Tests for Memory Module #42165

Closed
Tracked by #41680
llama90 opened this issue Jun 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #41680

[Java] Update Unit Tests for Memory Module #42165

llama90 opened this issue Jun 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Component: Java Type: enhancement
Milestone
17.0.0

Comments

@llama90
Copy link
Contributor

llama90 commented Jun 16, 2024

Describe the enhancement requested

This is a sub-issue of the issue below.

The unit tests should use the org.junit.jupiter.api package. This issue deals with the memory module.

Component(s)

Java
@llama90 llama90 mentioned this issue Jun 16, 2024
Closed
12 tasks
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this issue Jun 16, 2024
Merged
lidavidm pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2024
@edtbl76
GH-42165:[Java] Update Unit Tests for Memory Module (#42161)
ad4ff47 
### Rationale for this change

### What changes are included in this PR?

I followed the format for the other sub-issues of GH-41680 (flight, etc.) 

### Are these changes tested?
Yes. This is actually migration of tests from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5. They  pass. 

### Are there any user-facing changes?

* GitHub Issue: #41680
* GitHub Issue: #42165

Authored-by: Ed and Gravy <me@emangini.com>
Signed-off-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
@lidavidm lidavidm added this to the 17.0.0 milestone Jun 17, 2024
@lidavidm
Copy link
Member

Issue resolved by pull request 42161
#42161

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Component: Java Type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
17.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lidavidm @llama90