GO-3299: Change BuildAclList to BuildAclListWithIdentity #1137
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates focus on enhancing the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| func (s *service) Keys() *accountdata.AccountKeys { | ||
| return s.keyProvider.Account() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The verification script confirms that the Keys() method in the service struct within the core/anytype/account/service.go file interacts with keyProvider exactly as described in the provided code snippet. The method returns the result of s.keyProvider.Account(), which matches the implementation details provided in the review comment.
However, the review comment also mentions ensuring that the method handles possible errors, but the current implementation does not include error handling. This could be an oversight or a design choice depending on how errors are expected to be managed within the Account() method of keyProvider.
Conclusion
The interaction between the Keys() method and keyProvider is verified as correct. However, there is no error handling in the Keys() method, which might need attention depending on the error management strategy of the Account() method in keyProvider.
Analysis chain
Implementation of the Keys() method. Ensure that the method correctly interacts with keyProvider and handles possible errors.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the interaction between Keys() method and keyProvider.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (s *service) Keys() *accountdata.AccountKeys {
return s.keyProvider.Account()
}'
Length of output: 316
| @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ func (a *aclService) ViewInvite(ctx context.Context, inviteCid cid.Cid, inviteFi | |||
| if err != nil { | |||
| return inviteservice.InviteView{}, convertedOrAclRequestError(err) | |||
| } | |||
| lst, err := list.BuildAclList(store, list.NoOpAcceptorVerifier{}) | |||
| lst, err := list.BuildAclListWithIdentity(a.accountService.Keys(), store, list.NoOpAcceptorVerifier{}) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The verification process has revealed that the function BuildAclList has not been updated to BuildAclListWithIdentity in all parts of the application. Specifically, the file core/debug/treearchive/treeimporter.go still uses the old function signature. It is recommended to review this part of the code to determine if the update is necessary there as well, or if this usage is intentional and correct in its current form.
Analysis chain
Modified the BuildAclList function call to BuildAclListWithIdentity, adding the Keys() method as an argument. Ensure that this change is reflected in all relevant parts of the application and that the new method is properly tested.
- lst, err := list.BuildAclList(a.accountService.Keys(), store, list.NoOpAcceptorVerifier{})
+ lst, err := list.BuildAclListWithIdentity(a.accountService.Keys(), store, list.NoOpAcceptorVerifier{})Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of BuildAclList to ensure they are updated.
rg --type go 'BuildAclList\('
Length of output: 149
Coverage provided by https://github.com/seriousben/go-patch-cover-action |
Description
What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
Related Tickets & Documents
Mobile & Desktop Screenshots/Recordings
Added tests?
Added to documentation?
[optional] Are there any post-deployment tasks we need to perform?
Summary by CodeRabbit