Fix Droplet project_name parameter

[mamercad]

SUMMARY

Fixes #255; the Droplet module's project_name parameter, and, add an integration test to make sure.

ISSUE TYPE

• Bugfix Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME

• digital_ocean_droplet

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #256 (03a0eb8) into main (0eec11e) will decrease coverage by 33.06%.
The diff coverage is 5.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #256       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   64.11%   31.04%   -33.07%     
===========================================
  Files          45       45               
  Lines        3586     3595        +9     
  Branches      731      734        +3     
===========================================
- Hits         2299     1116     -1183     
- Misses        993     2460     +1467     
+ Partials      294       19      -275     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	?
sanity	26.39% <5.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
units	64.80% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
plugins/modules/digital_ocean_droplet.py	10.35% <5.00%> (-58.34%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/digital_ocean_project.py	19.62% <0.00%> (-64.49%)	⬇️
...lugins/modules/digital_ocean_domain_record_info.py	27.84% <0.00%> (-54.44%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/digital_ocean_database.py	16.21% <0.00%> (-52.03%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/digital_ocean_snapshot.py	24.39% <0.00%> (-51.22%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/digital_ocean_snapshot_info.py	40.00% <0.00%> (-47.50%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/digital_ocean_floating_ip.py	20.11% <0.00%> (-46.93%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/digital_ocean_cdn_endpoints.py	24.69% <0.00%> (-46.92%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/digital_ocean_domain_info.py	41.02% <0.00%> (-46.16%)	⬇️
... and 31 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[mamercad]

I'm going to close this in favor of the next major version of the collection.

[raman-babich]

@mamercad Why can't we merge it to 1.x.x version?

[mamercad]

@mamercad Why can't we merge it to 1.x.x version?

I've personally stopped development on this collection in favor of this one.