Fixes ipv6 remark parsing in older device

[roverflow]

SUMMARY

Fixes ipv6 remark parsing/processing in older device

Trival:
Also fixes error in integration test for lldp_interfaces

ISSUE TYPE

• Bugfix Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME

• ios_acls.py

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The cisco.ios.ios_acls module errors out when adding a remark to an IPv6 ACL ACE. This happens because the module does not properly process IPv6 ACL remarks, leading to unsupported parameters (is_remark_for, order, the_remark). The issue occurs specifically when an IPv6 ACL with a remark exists on the device.

Example:

Initial config in device causing error:

 ipv6 access-list extended std_acl_name_test_1
     10 remark std_acl_name_test_1
     20 permit 220 any any

run play:

- name: Ios acls test
  hosts: all
  gather_facts: False
  tasks:
    - name: Add ACL
      cisco.ios.ios_acls:
        config:
          - afi: ipv6
            acls:
              - name: new_test
                acl_type: extended
                aces:
                  - remarks:
                      - "Test_ipv4_ipv6_acl"
                  - destination:
                      any: true
                    grant: permit
                    protocol: 220
                    sequence: 40
                    source:
                      any: true
        state: merged

error:

ASK [Add ACL] ************************************************************************************************** fatal: [3850-01]: 
FAILED! => {   
 "changed": false,  
 "msg": "Unsupported parameters for (basic.py) module: config.acls.aces.is_remark_for, config.acls.aces.order, config.acls.aces.the_remark. Supported parameters include: destination, dscp, enable_fragments, evaluate, grant, log, log_input, option, precedence, protocol, protocol_options, remarks, sequence, source, time_range, tos, ttl." 
}

Fix:
There was a line commented that was supposed to process the ipv6 remartks which is now uncommented

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.40%. Comparing base (0635a8e) to head (4440610).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1159      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.35%   87.40%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         212      212              
  Lines       12522    12562      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits        10939    10980      +41     
+ Misses       1583     1582       -1     

see 8 files with indirect coverage changes