Rosetta stitching fix #227
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
ngreenwald
requested changes
Aug 29, 2022
ngreenwald
approved these changes
Aug 29, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If you haven't already, please read through our contributing guidelines before opening your PR
What is the purpose of this PR?
Closes #221.
Allows for stitching together of different size fov images.
How did you implement your changes
Adjust
get_max_img_sizeto have optionalfov_listarg which returns the max size for only the specified fovs in the run, and then editcopy_rosetta_filesto return the value. Thecreate_tiled_comparisonalso takes in the max image size as an argument. The rosetta notebook now requires the bin file directory to check the json run files.