Replace packages command with scan
#2446
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <wagoodman@users.noreply.github.com>
wagoodman
changed the title
packages command with scan
wagoodman
force-pushed
the
deprecate-packages-command
branch
from
3a8b0e2
to
0bd8122
Compare
Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <wagoodman@users.noreply.github.com>
wagoodman
force-pushed
the
deprecate-packages-command
branch
from
0bd8122
to
97b6639
Compare
Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <wagoodman@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <wagoodman@users.noreply.github.com>
GijsCalis
pushed a commit
to GijsCalis/syft
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2024
* replace packages command with scan Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <wagoodman@users.noreply.github.com> * add tests for packages alias Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <wagoodman@users.noreply.github.com> * update comments with referenes to the packages command Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <wagoodman@users.noreply.github.com> * rename valiadte args function Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <wagoodman@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <wagoodman@users.noreply.github.com>
sudo-bmitch
added a commit
to sudo-bmitch/regclient
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
syft packages was replaced by syft scan in github.com/anchore/syft/pull/2446 Signed-off-by: Brandon Mitchell <git@bmitch.net>
4 tasks
5 tasks
Noxsios
pushed a commit
to zarf-dev/zarf
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
## Description `syft packages` was deprecated in favor of `syft scan` in `v0.100.0` anchore/syft#2446 anchore/syft@v0.99.0...v0.100.0 <img width="1539" alt="deprecated" src="https://github.com/defenseunicorns/zarf/assets/87675701/0bc6fa1f-8397-482e-bd7d-3e3987355b48"> ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [x] Other (security config, docs update, etc) ## Checklist before merging - [x] Test, docs, adr added or updated as needed - [x] [Contributor Guide Steps](https://github.com/defenseunicorns/zarf/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#developer-workflow) followed
Merged
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One of the original ideas for syft was to expand the scope of the tooling to generally answer the question "what are all of the things that are in my artifact" even for things that might not fit into an SBOM. This has sense been focused down to items that can be expressed in an SBOM (which is why the secrets cataloger was removed for instance). For the same reason, as described in #516 , the
packagescommand no longer makes sense as a name (since we are always creating SBOMs from what we scan, instead of only showing packages or ). This PR addresses this by deprecating the currentpackagescommand in favor ofscan(still aliasing to the root command).So any current usage of the
packagescommand command......should be migrated to
scan:A warning banner has been added to help users transition to the new command:
Closes #516 (generally follows the final suggestion in #516 (comment) )