Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update core-js to version 1.2.5 🚀 #831

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello 👋

🚀🚀🚀

core-js just published its new version 1.2.5, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of core-js – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


GitHub Release

  • some more Number constructor fixes:
    • fixed V8 ~ Node 0.8 bug: Number('+0x1') should be NaN
    • fixed Number(' 0b1\n') case, should be 1
    • fixed Number() case, should be 0

The new version differs by 102 commits .

  • 3e36cc0 1.2.5
  • 45a91d5 one more fix forNumberconstructor:Number(' 0b1\n') -> 1case
  • f028c7c rename$.(expm1|log1p|sign)->$.math-$1``
  • b68f916 rename$.support-desc->$.descriptors``
  • 573491b rename$.same->$.same-value``
  • ed35f66 [experimental] little play with the typed arrays
  • 993e250 extract$.to-primitivehelper, one moreNumberconstructor fix
  • 33ae649 rename$.assign->$.object-assign``
  • 27d7dd6 rename$.unscope->$.add-to-unscopables``
  • babec57 rename$.species->$.set-species``
  • 1c62218 rename$.tag->$.set-to-string-tag``
  • a10b479 extract$.array-species-createand make it little more correct
  • bb2e44c fix for old V8 ~ Node 0.8Numberconstructor:Number('+0x1')should be NaN
  • 79e3a91 add some comments
  • c731610 inline digits validator totoNumber``

There are 102 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚡

@erwinmombay erwinmombay closed this Nov 2, 2015
@jridgewell jridgewell deleted the greenkeeper-core-js-1.2.5 branch February 19, 2016 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants