Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ ENHANCE: expand Dable AMP options #39413

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Minjiicho
Copy link

  • Add new option for special case
  • Add backup options to deliver accurate data

@amp-owners-bot amp-owners-bot bot requested a review from calebcordry August 28, 2023 03:08
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Aug 28, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@Minjiicho Minjiicho force-pushed the feature/add_logopts branch from 7bee2f5 to 5b24924 Compare August 28, 2023 12:28
@Minjiicho
Copy link
Author

Hi @calebcordry
Could you please advise why workflow jobs are not progressing and are on standby? 🙏

@erwinmombay erwinmombay requested review from powerivq and erwinmombay and removed request for calebcordry August 31, 2023 20:24
Copy link
Member

@erwinmombay erwinmombay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but will leave final approval to @powerivq

@@ -52,6 +56,10 @@ export function dable(global, data) {
widgetOpts.category3 = articleSection3;
logOpts.category3 = articleSection3;
}
if (orgServiceId) {
widgetOpts.orgServiceId = orgServiceId;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@powerivq these don't get obfuscated?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's up to Dable whether to do something about these parameters.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@erwinmombay Thank you for the review 🙏
It's an internally agreed value, so I don't think it'll be a problem but please let me know if you have any concerns.

@@ -52,6 +56,10 @@ export function dable(global, data) {
widgetOpts.category3 = articleSection3;
logOpts.category3 = articleSection3;
}
if (orgServiceId) {
widgetOpts.orgServiceId = orgServiceId;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's up to Dable whether to do something about these parameters.

@powerivq
Copy link
Contributor

powerivq commented Sep 1, 2023

For some reasons, circle build is not running. Can you rebase so that it can retry? @Minjiicho

@Minjiicho
Copy link
Author

For some reasons, circle build is not running. Can you rebase so that it can retry? @Minjiicho

@powerivq I made trivial update to the guide. Hope CircleCI rerun 🙏

@Minjiicho
Copy link
Author

@powerivq CircleCI is still on waiting 🤔
Please let me know if I can try someting.

@powerivq
Copy link
Contributor

powerivq commented Sep 1, 2023

@Minjiicho I suspect it is because the branch name contains /. You can try recreating a PR and see if it works.

@Minjiicho
Copy link
Author

@Minjiicho I suspect it is because the branch name contains /. You can try recreating a PR and see if it works.

@powerivq Thx for sharing suspicious part. Let me close this PR since reopened new PR #39433

@Minjiicho Minjiicho closed this Sep 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants