Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

W-12689952: add ibmmq binding in async21+ #1926

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 15, 2024
Merged

W-12689952: add ibmmq binding in async21+ #1926

merged 11 commits into from
Feb 15, 2024

Conversation

arielmirra
Copy link
Contributor

@arielmirra arielmirra commented Feb 7, 2024

  • W-12689952: add ibmmq message binding in async21+
  • W-12689952: add ibmmq server binding in async21+

@arielmirra arielmirra self-assigned this Feb 7, 2024
@arielmirra arielmirra force-pushed the W-12689952 branch 2 times, most recently from b612202 to 037a6b8 Compare February 7, 2024 18:52
@arielmirra arielmirra changed the title W-12689952: add ibmmq message binding in async21+ W-12689952: add ibmmq binding in async21+ Feb 7, 2024
- add message binding model, parser and emitter
- add unit validation and cycle tests
- add model to APIEntities and model.md
- add server binding model, parser and emitter
- add unit validation and cycle tests
- add model to APIEntities and model.md
- add channel binding model, parser and emitter
- add unit validation and cycle tests
- add model to APIEntities and model.md
@tomsfernandez
Copy link
Contributor

@arielmirra what about binding validations ?? Is this being tracked in another issue?

@tomsfernandez
Copy link
Contributor

@arielmirra Something I forgot in the review, you should check with Ale if the queue and topic field values of the ibmmq channel binding will be open or closed.

@arielmirra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tomsfernandez we've added an issue to add binding validations later on, as they require much more work.

@arielmirra arielmirra merged commit 74a2bf1 into develop Feb 15, 2024
6 checks passed
@arielmirra arielmirra deleted the W-12689952 branch February 15, 2024 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants