Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GitHub Action workflow for verifying pact tests #544

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2022

Conversation

kevindew
Copy link
Member

Trello: https://trello.com/c/QrxjshEm/270-move-ruby-gems-from-jenkins-to-github-actions

This moves the pact verification to a GitHub Action and will no longer be performed by a Jenkins build. This workflow will also be called by GDS API Adapters as part of it's CI build to assert that newly generated pacts are valid against this app. To avoid running this same task twice pact:verify is no longer part of the Jenkins test actions and instead the other rake default steps are included.

For more details see alphagov/gds-api-adapters#1175 where the wider change is being co-ordinated.

⚠️ This repo is Continuously Deployed: make sure you follow the guidance ⚠️

This moves the pact verification to a GitHub Action and will no longer
be performed by a Jenkins build. This workflow will also be called by
GDS API Adapters as part of it's CI build to assert that newly generated
pacts are valid against this app. To avoid running this same task twice
`pact:verify` is no longer part of the Jenkins test actions and instead
the other rake default steps are included.

For more details see alphagov/gds-api-adapters#1175
where the wider change is being co-ordinated.
@kevindew kevindew merged commit b01ce51 into main Nov 30, 2022
@kevindew kevindew deleted the pact-github-actions branch November 30, 2022 10:05
kevindew added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2022
Realised I should have added this in: #544
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants