-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CFE-599]: Refactor(components): react select input #1149
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
6 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve a significant refactor of various components within the codebase, particularly focusing on the select input functionality. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant FilterComponent
participant SelectInputBase
participant AssetOptions
User->>FilterComponent: Select an option
FilterComponent->>SelectInputBase: Trigger selection change
SelectInputBase->>AssetOptions: Fetch available options
AssetOptions-->>SelectInputBase: Return options
SelectInputBase-->>FilterComponent: Update selected option
FilterComponent-->>User: Display updated selection
Possibly related PRs
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/lib/components/json-schema/form/fields/MultiSchemaField.tsx (1)
183-183
: Consider marking thereadonly
prop as optional if it's not required.The addition of the
readonly
prop is a valid change that enables the component to receive areadonly
flag. However, the prop is not marked as optional, which means it is required to be passed to the component. If thereadonly
prop is not always required, consider marking it as optional to avoid passing it unnecessarily.- readonly, + readonly?,
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (26)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/TxRelationSelection.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/abi/args-form/field/ArgFieldWidget.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/forms/FilterByPermission.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/forms/SelectInputBase.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputFormatOptionLabel.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputMenuList.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputNoOptionsMessage.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputOption.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/lib/components/forms/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/fund/SelectFund.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/fund/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/json-schema/form/fields/MultiSchemaField.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/json-schema/form/widgets/SelectWidget.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelect.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectNoOptionsMessage.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectOption.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/pools/components/FilterByPoolType.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/proposal-details/components/vote-details/voting-period/validator-votes-table/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/proposal-details/components/vote-details/voting-period/votes-table/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/validator-details/components/tables/voted-proposals/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/validators/components/ActiveFilter.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/validators/components/OrderSelect.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/types/asset.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/lib/components/forms/index.ts
- src/lib/pages/pools/components/FilterByPoolType.tsx
Additional comments not posted (54)
src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputNoOptionsMessage.tsx (1)
8-10
: LGTM!The change in the props type aligns the component with the new
SelectInputOption<AssetOptionValue>
type, enhancing its type safety and flexibility. The component's behavior remains unchanged, as it still renders the "No matching assets found" message when no options are available.src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectNoOptionsMessage.tsx (1)
3-5
: LGTM!The changes to the
WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectNoOptionsMessage
component look good:
- The props type has been updated to use a more generic
SelectInputOption
type, which enhances the flexibility and reusability of the component.- The import statements have been adjusted to reflect the new types being used.
- The core functionality of the component remains unchanged, ensuring backward compatibility.
Overall, these changes improve the type safety and adaptability of the component without altering its behavior. Great work!
Also applies to: 7-7, 10-10
src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputFormatOptionLabel.tsx (1)
Line range hint
8-26
: LGTM!The changes to the
AssetInputFormatOptionLabel
component improve its clarity and functionality:
- The use of
SelectInputOption<AssetOptionValue>
type for thevalue
prop provides a more structured approach in passing the asset data.- The conditional rendering of the token image prevents potential errors from undefined properties.
- The use of
value.id
for thealt
text ensures that the correct identifier is used for accessibility purposes.Overall, these modifications streamline the props and enhance the conditional rendering logic.
src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputMenuList.tsx (1)
9-9
: LGTM!The change in the props type of
AssetInputMenuList
component fromMenuListProps<AssetOption, boolean, GroupBase<AssetOption>>
toMenuListProps<SelectInputOption<AssetOptionValue>>
aligns the component more closely with the intended use of theSelectInput
type and enhances type safety and clarity. The change suggests that the component is now designed to work with a different structure of input options, specifically one that is defined in the context ofSelectInput
. The removal of theGroupBase
type also indicates a potential simplification in the handling of grouped options.src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectOption.tsx (3)
5-6
: LGTM!The import statement is correct and follows the proper syntax. The imported type is used in the subsequent code changes.
7-10
: Great refactoring!The new type definitions are correct and follow the proper syntax. The use of type aliases improves code readability and maintainability. By leveraging the
SelectInputOption
type, theWasmVerifySubmitFormOption
type is now more generic and reusable, which aligns with the goals of the refactoring effort.
13-13
: LGTM!The updated type for the
props
parameter is correct and follows the proper syntax. The change ensures compatibility with the newWasmVerifySubmitFormOption
type, while the rest of the function implementation remains unchanged, indicating that the refactoring does not introduce any breaking changes.src/lib/types/asset.ts (2)
4-4
: LGTM!The import statement is correct and follows the proper syntax. The imported type is used later in the file to define the
AssetOption
type.
50-57
: Great work on enhancing the asset option representations!The introduction of the
AssetOptionValue
interface and the modification of theAssetOption
type to be based onSelectInputOption<AssetOptionValue>
provide a more structured and type-safe approach for handling asset options. These changes align with the use of theSelectInputOption
type from the forms library, indicating a move towards a more standardized implementation.The additional attributes in the
AssetOptionValue
interface, such asid
,logo
,formatted
, andprice
, enhance the clarity and extensibility of asset option representations. This will likely improve the functionality and maintainability of asset handling within the application.Overall, these changes demonstrate a well-thought-out refactor that promotes type safety, clarity, and standardization. Keep up the great work!
src/lib/components/forms/FilterByPermission.tsx (2)
6-6
: LGTM!The import statement has been correctly updated to import
SelectInputBase
instead ofSelectInput
, which is consistent with the component usage change in theFilterByPermission
component.
Line range hint
54-60
: Verify the impact of the component change.The
SelectInput
component has been correctly replaced withSelectInputBase
in theFilterByPermission
component, which is consistent with the updated import statement.Please ensure that the change from
SelectInput
toSelectInputBase
does not introduce any breaking changes or negatively impact the functionality and user experience of theFilterByPermission
component.Run the following script to verify the component usage and behavior:
Verification successful
Change from
SelectInput
toSelectInputBase
is verified.The
SelectInputBase
component is used across multiple components without any associated errors or warnings, indicating its stability and reliability. The change in theFilterByPermission
component does not introduce any issues.
- No errors, warnings, TODOs, or FIXMEs were found related to
SelectInputBase
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and behavior of the `SelectInputBase` component. # Test 1: Search for the component usage. Expect: Only occurrences of `SelectInputBase`. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'SelectInputBase' # Test 2: Search for any error messages or warnings related to the component. rg --type typescript $'SelectInputBase.*error|SelectInputBase.*warning' # Test 3: Verify the component behavior by running the relevant unit tests. fd -e test.tsx -x jest {} \;Length of output: 220
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script to verify the usage and behavior of the `SelectInputBase` component. # Test 1: Search for the component usage. Expect: Only occurrences of `SelectInputBase`. rg --type ts -A 5 $'SelectInputBase' # Test 2: Search for any error messages or warnings related to the component. rg --type ts $'SelectInputBase.*error|SelectInputBase.*warning' # Test 3: Search for any TODOs or FIXMEs related to `SelectInputBase`. rg --type ts $'SelectInputBase.*TODO|SelectInputBase.*FIXME'Length of output: 9530
src/lib/components/TxRelationSelection.tsx (2)
6-6
: LGTM!The import statement change from
SelectInput
toSelectInputBase
aligns with the component usage change within the file. It seems to be part of a larger refactor effort to standardize the select input functionality.
Line range hint
58-69
: Verify the component behavior.The component usage change from
SelectInput
toSelectInputBase
aligns with the import statement change and seems to be part of a larger refactor effort. However, please verify thatSelectInputBase
is indeed a drop-in replacement forSelectInput
and that the component behavior remains unaffected by this change.Run the following script to verify the component usage:
src/lib/pages/validators/components/ActiveFilter.tsx (2)
6-6
: LGTM!Importing
SelectInput
from a common forms library is a good refactor that can improve consistency and maintainability across the codebase.
50-52
: Verify themenuPortalTarget
change.The refactor looks good overall:
- Replacing the existing select implementation with
SelectInput
can improve maintainability and consistency.- Removing custom styles and properties simplifies the implementation.
- The handling of the selected option and change event remains intact.
However, explicitly setting
menuPortalTarget
todocument.body
may affect how the dropdown menu is rendered. Please verify this change to ensure the desired behavior.Run the following script to verify the
menuPortalTarget
change:Verification successful
Verification successful for
menuPortalTarget
change.The use of
menuPortalTarget={document.body}
is consistent across multiple components in the codebase, includingActiveFilter.tsx
. This indicates a deliberate design choice for rendering dropdown menus, and the change aligns with this pattern. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop. # Test: Search for the prop usage. Expect: Only explicit assignments to `document.body`. rg --type typescript $'menuPortalTarget\s*=\s*\{document\.body\}'Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop. # Test: Search for the prop usage in .ts and .tsx files. Expect: Only explicit assignments to `document.body`. rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' $'menuPortalTarget\\s*=\\s*\\{document\\.body\\}'Length of output: 551
src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputOption.tsx (4)
5-7
: LGTM!The new import statements for
SelectInputOption
andAssetOptionValue
types are necessary for the updated component props type. The import paths are correct and the types are being imported from the appropriate locations.
10-12
: LGTM!The
AssetInputOption
component's props type has been updated toOptionProps<SelectInputOption<AssetOptionValue>>
, which is more specific and includes theAssetOptionValue
type. This change is consistent with the new import statements and the updated rendering logic in the component.
44-53
: LGTM!The rendering logic for the token image has been updated to check for the existence of
data.value.logo
before rendering theTokenImageRenderWithCache
component, which prevents potential errors when the logo is not available. The updated props access is consistent with the new structure of theAssetOptionValue
type, and thegetTokenLabel
function is being used correctly to generate thealt
text for the token image.
60-60
: LGTM!The
formatted
andprice
values are now accessed throughdata.value
, which is consistent with the new structure of theAssetOptionValue
type. The fallback values of"0.000000"
and"$0.00"
are being used correctly when theformatted
andprice
values are not available.Also applies to: 66-66
src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/index.tsx (3)
5-6
: LGTM!The changes enhance code clarity and maintainability by:
- Replacing the third-party
Select
component with a customSelectInput
component, promoting a more standardized implementation.- Importing new types to improve type safety and clarity for handling asset options.
53-72
: LGTM!The changes improve the component's flexibility, clarity, and maintainability by:
- Utilizing the highly customizable
SelectInput
component with granular control over its behavior and appearance.- Simplifying the
onChange
handler to directly set the currency value based on the selected asset's ID from thevalue
prop.- Streamlining the custom styles to a single style for the menu width, enhancing code maintainability.
19-19
: Verify the impact on component usage.The changes enhance the component's controllability and maintainability by:
- Removing the
initialSelected
prop and introducing avalue
prop to manage the selected asset externally.- Utilizing the
Option<AssetOption>
type for thevalue
prop to improve type safety.Please verify that all usages of the
AssetInput
component have been updated to pass thevalue
prop correctly. Run the following script to check:Also applies to: 28-28
Verification successful
Verification successful:
AssetInput
component usage updated correctly.The
AssetInput
component insrc/lib/components/fund/SelectFund.tsx
has been updated to include thevalue
prop, ensuring it aligns with the recent changes for enhanced controllability. No further issues were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `AssetInput` component pass the `value` prop. # Test: Search for the component usage. Expect: `value` prop being passed. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'<AssetInput'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `AssetInput` component pass the `value` prop. # Test: Search for the component usage. Expect: `value` prop being passed. rg --type ts -A 5 $'<AssetInput'Length of output: 506
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `AssetInput` component include the `value` prop. # Test: Search for the component usage and check for the `value` prop. rg --type ts -A 10 $'<AssetInput' | grep -B 5 'value='Length of output: 567
src/lib/pages/validators/components/OrderSelect.tsx (4)
5-6
: LGTM!The imports are necessary for the refactored code and there are no issues.
8-13
: LGTM!The new interface
OrderOptionValue
and typeOrderOption
enhance the structure of the options being passed to the select input and improve type safety. The code changes look good.
Line range hint
15-52
: LGTM!The changes to the
ORDER_OPTIONS
array ensure that each option adheres to the definedOrderOption
structure. The code changes look good.
Line range hint
69-90
: LGTM!The refactor of the order selection logic using the custom
SelectInput
component enhances the type safety and structure. The component props are correctly configured and there are no issues with the code changes.src/lib/components/fund/index.tsx (2)
5-5
: LGTM!The import change from
SelectInput
toSelectInputBase
is consistent with the component usage change in the file. The naming suggests thatSelectInputBase
is a more foundational component, which aligns with the refactoring objective mentioned in the PR summary.
Line range hint
79-91
: VerifySelectInputBase
is a suitable replacement.The component usage change from
SelectInput
toSelectInputBase
looks good and aligns with the import statement change. The unchanged props suggest that the core functionality of theAttachFund
component is preserved.Please verify that the
SelectInputBase
component is a suitable replacement forSelectInput
and that it provides the necessary functionality and props. You can use the following script to search for the component definitions and compare their prop types:Verification successful
Verification Successful:
SelectInputBase
is a Suitable Replacement forSelectInput
.The
SelectInputBase
component provides additional customization options while retaining the core functionality of handling options and changes, making it a suitable replacement forSelectInput
. The component usage change aligns with the intended refactor to enhance select input functionality.
SelectInputBase
offers additional props such asformLabel
,initialSelected
,helperTextComponent
, and more, providing greater flexibility.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `SelectInputBase` is a suitable replacement for `SelectInput`. # Test 1: Search for the `SelectInput` component definition. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function SelectInput($$$) { $$$ }' # Test 2: Search for the `SelectInputBase` component definition. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function SelectInputBase($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 171
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for occurrences of `SelectInput` and `SelectInputBase` in the codebase. # Search for `SelectInput` occurrences. rg 'SelectInput' -A 5 # Search for `SelectInputBase` occurrences. rg 'SelectInputBase' -A 5Length of output: 37005
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the definitions of `SelectInput` and `SelectInputBase` to compare their prop types and functionalities. # Extract the definition of `SelectInput`. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const SelectInput = <$$$>({$$$}: SelectInputProps<$$$>) => ($$$)' src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx # Extract the definition of `SelectInputBase`. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const SelectInputBase = <$$$>({$$$}: SelectInputProps<$$$>) => ($$$)' src/lib/components/forms/SelectInputBase.tsxLength of output: 315
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for `SelectInput` and `SelectInputBase` in their respective files to understand their implementations. # Search for `SelectInput` in its file. rg 'SelectInput' -A 10 src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx # Search for `SelectInputBase` in its file. rg 'SelectInputBase' -A 10 src/lib/components/forms/SelectInputBase.tsxLength of output: 1598
src/lib/components/abi/args-form/field/ArgFieldWidget.tsx (3)
5-5
: LGTM!The import statement change is valid and consistent with the transition to the custom
SelectInput
component.
89-93
: LGTM!The component replacement and placeholder change are valid and do not introduce any issues.
97-97
: LGTM!The updated event handling for the
onChange
function is correct and consistent with the newSelectInput
component.src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelect.tsx (1)
6-7
: Verify the impact of the refactor changes.The refactor enhances the component's functionality and maintainability by using a more tailored and consistent input component. The consolidation of styles into the
chakraStyles
prop simplifies the styling approach and makes the component's styling more cohesive. Great work!Please verify the following:
Setting
menuPortalTarget
toundefined
may affect how the dropdown menu is rendered in relation to the rest of the DOM. Ensure that this change does not introduce any unintended behavior or visual issues.The removal of the filtering logic for options may indicate a change in how options are displayed or filtered based on user input. Confirm that the desired behavior is still achieved without the filtering logic.
Run the following script to verify the changes:
Also applies to: 60-95
Verification successful
Verification Successful: Refactor Changes Are Isolated and Complete
The refactor changes in
WasmVerifySubmitFormSelect.tsx
are isolated to the component and do not affect other parts of the codebase. ThemenuPortalTarget
prop is only set toundefined
within this component, and the filtering logic has been completely removed. No issues were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the refactor changes. # Test 1: Search for the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop. Expect: No other occurrences. rg --type typescript $'menuPortalTarget={undefined}' # Test 2: Search for the removed filtering logic. Expect: No occurrences of the removed code. rg --type typescript $'options={options.filter\(\(option\) => \{(.*\n)*?.*\}\)}'Length of output: 571
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the refactor changes with corrected regex patterns. # Test 1: Search for the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop. Expect: No other occurrences. rg --type typescript 'menuPortalTarget\s*=\s*{undefined}' # Test 2: Search for the removed filtering logic. Expect: No occurrences of the removed code. rg --type typescript 'options\s*=\s*{options\.filter\(\(option\)\s*=>\s*\{[^}]*\}\)}'Length of output: 448
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the refactor changes with properly escaped regex patterns. # Test 1: Search for the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop. Expect: No other occurrences. rg --type typescript 'menuPortalTarget\s*=\s*\{undefined\}' # Test 2: Search for the removed filtering logic. Expect: No occurrences of the removed code. rg --type typescript 'options\s*=\s*\{options\.filter\(\(option\)\s*=>\s*\{[^}]*\}\)\}'Length of output: 221
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the refactor changes with the correct file type identifier. # Test 1: Search for the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop. Expect: No other occurrences. rg --type ts 'menuPortalTarget\s*=\s*\{undefined\}' # Test 2: Search for the removed filtering logic. Expect: No occurrences of the removed code. rg --type ts 'options\s*=\s*\{options\.filter\(\(option\)\s*=>\s*\{[^}]*\}\)\}'Length of output: 247
src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx (4)
1-3
: LGTM!The new imports are necessary for the refactored component and do not introduce any issues.
5-16
: Great refactor!The new type
SelectInputOptionValue
and interfaceSelectInputOption
provide a more flexible and standardized approach to defining options and handling changes. The changes to theSelectInputProps
interface align the component more closely with thechakra-react-select
ecosystem and improve the component's usability and type safety.
18-27
: Nice encapsulation!The new function
handleFilterOption
enhances readability and maintainability by separating the filtering logic from the component. It correctly handles the case when the input is empty and returns true to include all options.
29-107
: Excellent refactor!The refactored
SelectInput
component simplifies the structure by leveraging the built-in functionalities of theSelect
component fromchakra-react-select
. The changes align the component more closely with the Chakra UI ecosystem, reduce complexity, and enhance functionality.The use of the new
SelectInputOption
andSelectInputProps
types improves the component's usability and type safety. The removal of manual handling of popover behavior and input management streamlines the component's implementation.The styling adjustments through the
chakraStyles
prop allow for a more cohesive integration with Chakra UI's styling system, enhancing the component's visual consistency.Overall, the refactor significantly improves the component's usability, maintainability, and alignment with the Chakra UI ecosystem.
src/lib/components/json-schema/form/widgets/SelectWidget.tsx (5)
18-19
: LGTM!Replacing the
Select
component with a customSelectInput
component is a good move towards a more tailored implementation of the select input. This change should provide better integration with the rest of the form components and potentially improve maintainability and performance.
Line range hint
101-113
: LGTM!The simplification of the options handling and the removal of unnecessary type annotations is a good change. It streamlines the code while maintaining the overall structure of the component.
153-160
: LGTM!The replacement of the
Select
component with theSelectInput
component and the added or modified props are consistent with the overall refactor. These changes should provide better control over the behavior of the select input.
165-165
: LGTM!Setting a default size for the select input is a minor change that shouldn't have any significant impact on the functionality.
Line range hint
1-175
: Great refactor!The refactor of the
SelectWidget
component, including the replacement of theSelect
component with a customSelectInput
component, the modifications to props, and the simplification of options handling, is well-executed and consistent. These changes should improve the maintainability, performance, and integration of the select input with the rest of the form components.The code is clean, and there are no apparent issues or inconsistencies. Overall, this refactor aligns with the objectives and should provide the desired benefits.
src/lib/components/fund/SelectFund.tsx (4)
94-99
: LGTM!The change to the
value
property structure for asset objects inassetInfosInBalance
enhances the data representation by including more relevant information about each asset. This change is consistent with the provided summary and does not introduce any issues.
105-108
: LGTM!The change to the
value
property structure for asset objects inassetInfosNotInBalance
enhances the data representation by including more relevant information about each asset. This change is consistent with the provided summary and does not introduce any issues.
166-166
: LGTM!The change from
initialSelected
tovalue
prop forassetOptions
improves the clarity and maintainability of the code by explicitly handling the selected values based on the asset's ID. This change is consistent with the provided summary and does not introduce any issues.
Line range hint
1-196
: Overall, the changes in this file look good to me!The refactoring of the
SelectFund
component, particularly the modifications to the asset information structure and the handling of selected values, enhances the data representation and improves the clarity and maintainability of the code. The changes are consistent with the provided summary and do not introduce any issues or inconsistencies.Great work on this refactor! Let me know if you have any further questions or concerns.
src/lib/components/forms/SelectInputBase.tsx (1)
1-207
: LGTM!The
SelectInputBase
component is well-structured, properly typed, and follows best practices. It effectively uses Chakra UI components and hooks, and is customizable through props. The component correctly handles the selected option state and renders the options and selected option. It also properly handles disabled options and uses memoization to avoid unnecessary re-renders.Great job on this refactor! The component is now more reusable and maintainable.
src/lib/pages/validator-details/components/tables/voted-proposals/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
168-176
: LGTM!The usage of
SelectInputBase
for rendering the vote answer filter dropdown looks good:
- The
answerOptions
array is correctly passed as theoptions
prop.- The
handleOnAnswerFilterChange
function is correctly passed as theonChange
prop to update the selected filter.- The
answerFilter
state variable is passed as theinitialSelected
prop.- The label and popover background colors are customized using the
labelBgColor
andpopoverBgColor
props.- The
disableMaxH
prop is set to adjust the popover height behavior.No issues found.
src/lib/pages/proposal-details/components/vote-details/voting-period/votes-table/index.tsx (2)
6-6
: Verify the impact of replacingSelectInput
withSelectInputBase
.The change looks good. However, please ensure that replacing
SelectInput
withSelectInputBase
does not introduce any regressions in the filtering mechanism or the overall functionality of the proposal voting table.
Line range hint
193-200
: LGTM!The usage of
SelectInputBase
component looks correct and is consistent with the import statement change.src/lib/pages/proposal-details/components/vote-details/voting-period/validator-votes-table/index.tsx (2)
6-6
: LGTM!The change from
SelectInput
toSelectInputBase
aligns with the refactor objectives and is unlikely to introduce any issues.
Line range hint
210-217
: Looks good!The change from
SelectInput
toSelectInputBase
is consistent with the refactor objectives. The usage ofProposalVoteType
as a generic type argument and the additional props passed toSelectInputBase
are appropriate and unlikely to introduce any issues.src/lib/components/json-schema/form/fields/MultiSchemaField.tsx (1)
306-306
: LGTM!Passing the
readonly
prop to theWidget
component is consistent with the addition of the prop to theMultiSchemaField
component. This change enables control over whether the field can be edited based on thereadonly
state.CHANGELOG.md (2)
44-45
: Looks good!The changelog entry concisely captures the essence of the refactor. Nice work!
48-48
: LGTM!The changelog entry provides the right level of detail for the bug fix. Good job capturing the key points.
src/lib/pages/validator-details/components/tables/voted-proposals/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelect.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unless @songwong commented, others are LGTM.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
SelectInputBase
, a customizable select input component for improved user interaction.Bug Fixes
Refactor
SelectInputBase
, enhancing maintainability and performance.Select
component in several areas.Documentation