Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CFE-599]: Refactor(components): react select input #1149

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

Poafs1
Copy link
Collaborator

@Poafs1 Poafs1 commented Sep 12, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced SelectInputBase, a customizable select input component for improved user interaction.
    • Enhanced asset selection logic with a more structured representation of asset options.
    • Added a theme configuration for consistent styling across the application.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No new bug fixes mentioned in this update.
  • Refactor

    • Refactored various components to utilize SelectInputBase, enhancing maintainability and performance.
    • Simplified select input handling and styling across multiple components.
    • Streamlined the implementation of the Select component in several areas.
  • Documentation

    • Updated changelog to reflect new improvements and bug fixes.

Copy link

linear bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 12, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
celatone-frontend-staging ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 17, 2024 5:13am
6 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
celatone-frontend-main ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 17, 2024 5:13am
initia-celatone-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 17, 2024 5:13am
neutron-celatone-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 17, 2024 5:13am
osmosis-celatone-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 17, 2024 5:13am
sei-celatone-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 17, 2024 5:13am
terra-celatone-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 17, 2024 5:13am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve a significant refactor of various components within the codebase, particularly focusing on the select input functionality. The SelectInput component has been replaced with SelectInputBase in multiple files, indicating a shift towards a more standardized implementation. Additionally, several components have been updated to utilize a new structure for handling asset options, enhancing type safety and clarity. The refactor also includes modifications to props and the introduction of new interfaces, streamlining the overall component architecture.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/lib/components/TxRelationSelection.tsx, src/lib/components/forms/FilterByPermission.tsx, src/lib/components/forms/index.ts, src/lib/components/fund/index.tsx, src/lib/pages/pools/components/FilterByPoolType.tsx, src/lib/pages/proposal-details/components/vote-details/voting-period/validator-votes-table/index.tsx, src/lib/pages/proposal-details/components/vote-details/voting-period/votes-table/index.tsx, src/lib/pages/validator-details/components/tables/voted-proposals/index.tsx, src/lib/pages/validators/components/ActiveFilter.tsx, src/lib/pages/validators/components/OrderSelect.tsx Renamed SelectInput to SelectInputBase, indicating a shift in the underlying implementation or functionality.
src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx, src/lib/components/forms/SelectInputBase.tsx Refactored SelectInput to utilize the Select component from chakra-react-select, simplifying the structure and enhancing usability. Introduced SelectInputBase as a new customizable select input component with internal state management and enhanced props for better functionality.
src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputFormatOptionLabel.tsx, src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputMenuList.tsx, src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputNoOptionsMessage.tsx, src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputOption.tsx, src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/index.tsx Updated to work with a new structured option type, enhancing type safety and clarity in handling asset options.
src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelect.tsx, src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectNoOptionsMessage.tsx, src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectOption.tsx Refactored to utilize the new SelectInput component and updated type definitions for options, enhancing flexibility and maintainability.
src/lib/types/asset.ts Introduced a new interface AssetOptionValue for a more detailed representation of asset options and modified the AssetOption type to be based on SelectInputOption.
src/lib/components/forms/forms/FilterByPermission.tsx Updated import statements and component usage to reflect the new structure and naming conventions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant FilterComponent
    participant SelectInputBase
    participant AssetOptions

    User->>FilterComponent: Select an option
    FilterComponent->>SelectInputBase: Trigger selection change
    SelectInputBase->>AssetOptions: Fetch available options
    AssetOptions-->>SelectInputBase: Return options
    SelectInputBase-->>FilterComponent: Update selected option
    FilterComponent-->>User: Display updated selection
Loading

🐇 In the code, we hop and play,
New inputs lead the way!
With options bright and clear,
Selecting brings us cheer!
A refactor, oh so neat,
Makes our forms a tasty treat! 🥕

Possibly related PRs

  • [CFE-599]: Refactor(components): react select input #1149: The main PR involves a refactor of the SelectInput component, which is directly related to the changes in the SelectInputBase component, as it indicates a transition from SelectInput to SelectInputBase in multiple components.
  • fix(components): add zod validation to pages #1094: This PR discusses the replacement of the getFirstQueryParam function with Zod validation, which is relevant as it indicates improvements in validation processes that may relate to the overall enhancements mentioned in the main PR.

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a945962 and b56276a.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI o1 for code reviews: OpenAI's new o1 model is being tested for generating code suggestions in code reviews.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/lib/components/json-schema/form/fields/MultiSchemaField.tsx (1)

183-183: Consider marking the readonly prop as optional if it's not required.

The addition of the readonly prop is a valid change that enables the component to receive a readonly flag. However, the prop is not marked as optional, which means it is required to be passed to the component. If the readonly prop is not always required, consider marking it as optional to avoid passing it unnecessarily.

-  readonly,
+  readonly?,
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3f22693 and 61ce10f.

Files selected for processing (26)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/TxRelationSelection.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/abi/args-form/field/ArgFieldWidget.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/forms/FilterByPermission.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/forms/SelectInputBase.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputFormatOptionLabel.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputMenuList.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputNoOptionsMessage.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputOption.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/index.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/forms/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/fund/SelectFund.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/fund/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/json-schema/form/fields/MultiSchemaField.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/json-schema/form/widgets/SelectWidget.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelect.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectNoOptionsMessage.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectOption.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/pools/components/FilterByPoolType.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/proposal-details/components/vote-details/voting-period/validator-votes-table/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/proposal-details/components/vote-details/voting-period/votes-table/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/validator-details/components/tables/voted-proposals/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/validators/components/ActiveFilter.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/validators/components/OrderSelect.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/types/asset.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • src/lib/components/forms/index.ts
  • src/lib/pages/pools/components/FilterByPoolType.tsx
Additional comments not posted (54)
src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputNoOptionsMessage.tsx (1)

8-10: LGTM!

The change in the props type aligns the component with the new SelectInputOption<AssetOptionValue> type, enhancing its type safety and flexibility. The component's behavior remains unchanged, as it still renders the "No matching assets found" message when no options are available.

src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectNoOptionsMessage.tsx (1)

3-5: LGTM!

The changes to the WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectNoOptionsMessage component look good:

  • The props type has been updated to use a more generic SelectInputOption type, which enhances the flexibility and reusability of the component.
  • The import statements have been adjusted to reflect the new types being used.
  • The core functionality of the component remains unchanged, ensuring backward compatibility.

Overall, these changes improve the type safety and adaptability of the component without altering its behavior. Great work!

Also applies to: 7-7, 10-10

src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputFormatOptionLabel.tsx (1)

Line range hint 8-26: LGTM!

The changes to the AssetInputFormatOptionLabel component improve its clarity and functionality:

  • The use of SelectInputOption<AssetOptionValue> type for the value prop provides a more structured approach in passing the asset data.
  • The conditional rendering of the token image prevents potential errors from undefined properties.
  • The use of value.id for the alt text ensures that the correct identifier is used for accessibility purposes.

Overall, these modifications streamline the props and enhance the conditional rendering logic.

src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputMenuList.tsx (1)

9-9: LGTM!

The change in the props type of AssetInputMenuList component from MenuListProps<AssetOption, boolean, GroupBase<AssetOption>> to MenuListProps<SelectInputOption<AssetOptionValue>> aligns the component more closely with the intended use of the SelectInput type and enhances type safety and clarity. The change suggests that the component is now designed to work with a different structure of input options, specifically one that is defined in the context of SelectInput. The removal of the GroupBase type also indicates a potential simplification in the handling of grouped options.

src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelectOption.tsx (3)

5-6: LGTM!

The import statement is correct and follows the proper syntax. The imported type is used in the subsequent code changes.


7-10: Great refactoring!

The new type definitions are correct and follow the proper syntax. The use of type aliases improves code readability and maintainability. By leveraging the SelectInputOption type, the WasmVerifySubmitFormOption type is now more generic and reusable, which aligns with the goals of the refactoring effort.


13-13: LGTM!

The updated type for the props parameter is correct and follows the proper syntax. The change ensures compatibility with the new WasmVerifySubmitFormOption type, while the rest of the function implementation remains unchanged, indicating that the refactoring does not introduce any breaking changes.

src/lib/types/asset.ts (2)

4-4: LGTM!

The import statement is correct and follows the proper syntax. The imported type is used later in the file to define the AssetOption type.


50-57: Great work on enhancing the asset option representations!

The introduction of the AssetOptionValue interface and the modification of the AssetOption type to be based on SelectInputOption<AssetOptionValue> provide a more structured and type-safe approach for handling asset options. These changes align with the use of the SelectInputOption type from the forms library, indicating a move towards a more standardized implementation.

The additional attributes in the AssetOptionValue interface, such as id, logo, formatted, and price, enhance the clarity and extensibility of asset option representations. This will likely improve the functionality and maintainability of asset handling within the application.

Overall, these changes demonstrate a well-thought-out refactor that promotes type safety, clarity, and standardization. Keep up the great work!

src/lib/components/forms/FilterByPermission.tsx (2)

6-6: LGTM!

The import statement has been correctly updated to import SelectInputBase instead of SelectInput, which is consistent with the component usage change in the FilterByPermission component.


Line range hint 54-60: Verify the impact of the component change.

The SelectInput component has been correctly replaced with SelectInputBase in the FilterByPermission component, which is consistent with the updated import statement.

Please ensure that the change from SelectInput to SelectInputBase does not introduce any breaking changes or negatively impact the functionality and user experience of the FilterByPermission component.

Run the following script to verify the component usage and behavior:

Verification successful

Change from SelectInput to SelectInputBase is verified.

The SelectInputBase component is used across multiple components without any associated errors or warnings, indicating its stability and reliability. The change in the FilterByPermission component does not introduce any issues.

  • No errors, warnings, TODOs, or FIXMEs were found related to SelectInputBase.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage and behavior of the `SelectInputBase` component.

# Test 1: Search for the component usage. Expect: Only occurrences of `SelectInputBase`.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'SelectInputBase'

# Test 2: Search for any error messages or warnings related to the component.
rg --type typescript $'SelectInputBase.*error|SelectInputBase.*warning'

# Test 3: Verify the component behavior by running the relevant unit tests.
fd -e test.tsx -x jest {} \;

Length of output: 220


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Corrected script to verify the usage and behavior of the `SelectInputBase` component.

# Test 1: Search for the component usage. Expect: Only occurrences of `SelectInputBase`.
rg --type ts -A 5 $'SelectInputBase'

# Test 2: Search for any error messages or warnings related to the component.
rg --type ts $'SelectInputBase.*error|SelectInputBase.*warning'

# Test 3: Search for any TODOs or FIXMEs related to `SelectInputBase`.
rg --type ts $'SelectInputBase.*TODO|SelectInputBase.*FIXME'

Length of output: 9530

src/lib/components/TxRelationSelection.tsx (2)

6-6: LGTM!

The import statement change from SelectInput to SelectInputBase aligns with the component usage change within the file. It seems to be part of a larger refactor effort to standardize the select input functionality.


Line range hint 58-69: Verify the component behavior.

The component usage change from SelectInput to SelectInputBase aligns with the import statement change and seems to be part of a larger refactor effort. However, please verify that SelectInputBase is indeed a drop-in replacement for SelectInput and that the component behavior remains unaffected by this change.

Run the following script to verify the component usage:

src/lib/pages/validators/components/ActiveFilter.tsx (2)

6-6: LGTM!

Importing SelectInput from a common forms library is a good refactor that can improve consistency and maintainability across the codebase.


50-52: Verify the menuPortalTarget change.

The refactor looks good overall:

  • Replacing the existing select implementation with SelectInput can improve maintainability and consistency.
  • Removing custom styles and properties simplifies the implementation.
  • The handling of the selected option and change event remains intact.

However, explicitly setting menuPortalTarget to document.body may affect how the dropdown menu is rendered. Please verify this change to ensure the desired behavior.

Run the following script to verify the menuPortalTarget change:

Verification successful

Verification successful for menuPortalTarget change.

The use of menuPortalTarget={document.body} is consistent across multiple components in the codebase, including ActiveFilter.tsx. This indicates a deliberate design choice for rendering dropdown menus, and the change aligns with this pattern. No issues found.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop.

# Test: Search for the prop usage. Expect: Only explicit assignments to `document.body`.
rg --type typescript $'menuPortalTarget\s*=\s*\{document\.body\}'

Length of output: 101


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop.

# Test: Search for the prop usage in .ts and .tsx files. Expect: Only explicit assignments to `document.body`.
rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' $'menuPortalTarget\\s*=\\s*\\{document\\.body\\}'

Length of output: 551

src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/AssetInputOption.tsx (4)

5-7: LGTM!

The new import statements for SelectInputOption and AssetOptionValue types are necessary for the updated component props type. The import paths are correct and the types are being imported from the appropriate locations.


10-12: LGTM!

The AssetInputOption component's props type has been updated to OptionProps<SelectInputOption<AssetOptionValue>>, which is more specific and includes the AssetOptionValue type. This change is consistent with the new import statements and the updated rendering logic in the component.


44-53: LGTM!

The rendering logic for the token image has been updated to check for the existence of data.value.logo before rendering the TokenImageRenderWithCache component, which prevents potential errors when the logo is not available. The updated props access is consistent with the new structure of the AssetOptionValue type, and the getTokenLabel function is being used correctly to generate the alt text for the token image.


60-60: LGTM!

The formatted and price values are now accessed through data.value, which is consistent with the new structure of the AssetOptionValue type. The fallback values of "0.000000" and "$0.00" are being used correctly when the formatted and price values are not available.

Also applies to: 66-66

src/lib/components/forms/asset-input/index.tsx (3)

5-6: LGTM!

The changes enhance code clarity and maintainability by:

  • Replacing the third-party Select component with a custom SelectInput component, promoting a more standardized implementation.
  • Importing new types to improve type safety and clarity for handling asset options.

53-72: LGTM!

The changes improve the component's flexibility, clarity, and maintainability by:

  • Utilizing the highly customizable SelectInput component with granular control over its behavior and appearance.
  • Simplifying the onChange handler to directly set the currency value based on the selected asset's ID from the value prop.
  • Streamlining the custom styles to a single style for the menu width, enhancing code maintainability.

19-19: Verify the impact on component usage.

The changes enhance the component's controllability and maintainability by:

  • Removing the initialSelected prop and introducing a value prop to manage the selected asset externally.
  • Utilizing the Option<AssetOption> type for the value prop to improve type safety.

Please verify that all usages of the AssetInput component have been updated to pass the value prop correctly. Run the following script to check:

Also applies to: 28-28

Verification successful

Verification successful: AssetInput component usage updated correctly.

The AssetInput component in src/lib/components/fund/SelectFund.tsx has been updated to include the value prop, ensuring it aligns with the recent changes for enhanced controllability. No further issues were found.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all usages of the `AssetInput` component pass the `value` prop.

# Test: Search for the component usage. Expect: `value` prop being passed.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'<AssetInput'

Length of output: 76


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all usages of the `AssetInput` component pass the `value` prop.

# Test: Search for the component usage. Expect: `value` prop being passed.
rg --type ts -A 5 $'<AssetInput'

Length of output: 506


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all usages of the `AssetInput` component include the `value` prop.

# Test: Search for the component usage and check for the `value` prop.
rg --type ts -A 10 $'<AssetInput' | grep -B 5 'value='

Length of output: 567

src/lib/pages/validators/components/OrderSelect.tsx (4)

5-6: LGTM!

The imports are necessary for the refactored code and there are no issues.


8-13: LGTM!

The new interface OrderOptionValue and type OrderOption enhance the structure of the options being passed to the select input and improve type safety. The code changes look good.


Line range hint 15-52: LGTM!

The changes to the ORDER_OPTIONS array ensure that each option adheres to the defined OrderOption structure. The code changes look good.


Line range hint 69-90: LGTM!

The refactor of the order selection logic using the custom SelectInput component enhances the type safety and structure. The component props are correctly configured and there are no issues with the code changes.

src/lib/components/fund/index.tsx (2)

5-5: LGTM!

The import change from SelectInput to SelectInputBase is consistent with the component usage change in the file. The naming suggests that SelectInputBase is a more foundational component, which aligns with the refactoring objective mentioned in the PR summary.


Line range hint 79-91: Verify SelectInputBase is a suitable replacement.

The component usage change from SelectInput to SelectInputBase looks good and aligns with the import statement change. The unchanged props suggest that the core functionality of the AttachFund component is preserved.

Please verify that the SelectInputBase component is a suitable replacement for SelectInput and that it provides the necessary functionality and props. You can use the following script to search for the component definitions and compare their prop types:

Verification successful

Verification Successful: SelectInputBase is a Suitable Replacement for SelectInput.

The SelectInputBase component provides additional customization options while retaining the core functionality of handling options and changes, making it a suitable replacement for SelectInput. The component usage change aligns with the intended refactor to enhance select input functionality.

  • SelectInputBase offers additional props such as formLabel, initialSelected, helperTextComponent, and more, providing greater flexibility.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify `SelectInputBase` is a suitable replacement for `SelectInput`.

# Test 1: Search for the `SelectInput` component definition.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function SelectInput($$$) {
  $$$
}'

# Test 2: Search for the `SelectInputBase` component definition.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function SelectInputBase($$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 171


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for occurrences of `SelectInput` and `SelectInputBase` in the codebase.

# Search for `SelectInput` occurrences.
rg 'SelectInput' -A 5

# Search for `SelectInputBase` occurrences.
rg 'SelectInputBase' -A 5

Length of output: 37005


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the definitions of `SelectInput` and `SelectInputBase` to compare their prop types and functionalities.

# Extract the definition of `SelectInput`.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const SelectInput = <$$$>({$$$}: SelectInputProps<$$$>) => ($$$)' src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx

# Extract the definition of `SelectInputBase`.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const SelectInputBase = <$$$>({$$$}: SelectInputProps<$$$>) => ($$$)' src/lib/components/forms/SelectInputBase.tsx

Length of output: 315


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for `SelectInput` and `SelectInputBase` in their respective files to understand their implementations.

# Search for `SelectInput` in its file.
rg 'SelectInput' -A 10 src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx

# Search for `SelectInputBase` in its file.
rg 'SelectInputBase' -A 10 src/lib/components/forms/SelectInputBase.tsx

Length of output: 1598

src/lib/components/abi/args-form/field/ArgFieldWidget.tsx (3)

5-5: LGTM!

The import statement change is valid and consistent with the transition to the custom SelectInput component.


89-93: LGTM!

The component replacement and placeholder change are valid and do not introduce any issues.


97-97: LGTM!

The updated event handling for the onChange function is correct and consistent with the new SelectInput component.

src/lib/components/modal/wasm-verify-submit/WasmVerifySubmitFormSelect.tsx (1)

6-7: Verify the impact of the refactor changes.

The refactor enhances the component's functionality and maintainability by using a more tailored and consistent input component. The consolidation of styles into the chakraStyles prop simplifies the styling approach and makes the component's styling more cohesive. Great work!

Please verify the following:

  1. Setting menuPortalTarget to undefined may affect how the dropdown menu is rendered in relation to the rest of the DOM. Ensure that this change does not introduce any unintended behavior or visual issues.

  2. The removal of the filtering logic for options may indicate a change in how options are displayed or filtered based on user input. Confirm that the desired behavior is still achieved without the filtering logic.

Run the following script to verify the changes:

Also applies to: 60-95

Verification successful

Verification Successful: Refactor Changes Are Isolated and Complete

The refactor changes in WasmVerifySubmitFormSelect.tsx are isolated to the component and do not affect other parts of the codebase. The menuPortalTarget prop is only set to undefined within this component, and the filtering logic has been completely removed. No issues were found.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the refactor changes.

# Test 1: Search for the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop. Expect: No other occurrences.
rg --type typescript $'menuPortalTarget={undefined}'

# Test 2: Search for the removed filtering logic. Expect: No occurrences of the removed code.
rg --type typescript $'options={options.filter\(\(option\) => \{(.*\n)*?.*\}\)}'

Length of output: 571


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the refactor changes with corrected regex patterns.

# Test 1: Search for the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop. Expect: No other occurrences.
rg --type typescript 'menuPortalTarget\s*=\s*{undefined}'

# Test 2: Search for the removed filtering logic. Expect: No occurrences of the removed code.
rg --type typescript 'options\s*=\s*{options\.filter\(\(option\)\s*=>\s*\{[^}]*\}\)}'

Length of output: 448


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the refactor changes with properly escaped regex patterns.

# Test 1: Search for the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop. Expect: No other occurrences.
rg --type typescript 'menuPortalTarget\s*=\s*\{undefined\}'

# Test 2: Search for the removed filtering logic. Expect: No occurrences of the removed code.
rg --type typescript 'options\s*=\s*\{options\.filter\(\(option\)\s*=>\s*\{[^}]*\}\)\}'

Length of output: 221


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the refactor changes with the correct file type identifier.

# Test 1: Search for the usage of `menuPortalTarget` prop. Expect: No other occurrences.
rg --type ts 'menuPortalTarget\s*=\s*\{undefined\}'

# Test 2: Search for the removed filtering logic. Expect: No occurrences of the removed code.
rg --type ts 'options\s*=\s*\{options\.filter\(\(option\)\s*=>\s*\{[^}]*\}\)\}'

Length of output: 247

src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx (4)

1-3: LGTM!

The new imports are necessary for the refactored component and do not introduce any issues.


5-16: Great refactor!

The new type SelectInputOptionValue and interface SelectInputOption provide a more flexible and standardized approach to defining options and handling changes. The changes to the SelectInputProps interface align the component more closely with the chakra-react-select ecosystem and improve the component's usability and type safety.


18-27: Nice encapsulation!

The new function handleFilterOption enhances readability and maintainability by separating the filtering logic from the component. It correctly handles the case when the input is empty and returns true to include all options.


29-107: Excellent refactor!

The refactored SelectInput component simplifies the structure by leveraging the built-in functionalities of the Select component from chakra-react-select. The changes align the component more closely with the Chakra UI ecosystem, reduce complexity, and enhance functionality.

The use of the new SelectInputOption and SelectInputProps types improves the component's usability and type safety. The removal of manual handling of popover behavior and input management streamlines the component's implementation.

The styling adjustments through the chakraStyles prop allow for a more cohesive integration with Chakra UI's styling system, enhancing the component's visual consistency.

Overall, the refactor significantly improves the component's usability, maintainability, and alignment with the Chakra UI ecosystem.

src/lib/components/json-schema/form/widgets/SelectWidget.tsx (5)

18-19: LGTM!

Replacing the Select component with a custom SelectInput component is a good move towards a more tailored implementation of the select input. This change should provide better integration with the rest of the form components and potentially improve maintainability and performance.


Line range hint 101-113: LGTM!

The simplification of the options handling and the removal of unnecessary type annotations is a good change. It streamlines the code while maintaining the overall structure of the component.


153-160: LGTM!

The replacement of the Select component with the SelectInput component and the added or modified props are consistent with the overall refactor. These changes should provide better control over the behavior of the select input.


165-165: LGTM!

Setting a default size for the select input is a minor change that shouldn't have any significant impact on the functionality.


Line range hint 1-175: Great refactor!

The refactor of the SelectWidget component, including the replacement of the Select component with a custom SelectInput component, the modifications to props, and the simplification of options handling, is well-executed and consistent. These changes should improve the maintainability, performance, and integration of the select input with the rest of the form components.

The code is clean, and there are no apparent issues or inconsistencies. Overall, this refactor aligns with the objectives and should provide the desired benefits.

src/lib/components/fund/SelectFund.tsx (4)

94-99: LGTM!

The change to the value property structure for asset objects in assetInfosInBalance enhances the data representation by including more relevant information about each asset. This change is consistent with the provided summary and does not introduce any issues.


105-108: LGTM!

The change to the value property structure for asset objects in assetInfosNotInBalance enhances the data representation by including more relevant information about each asset. This change is consistent with the provided summary and does not introduce any issues.


166-166: LGTM!

The change from initialSelected to value prop for assetOptions improves the clarity and maintainability of the code by explicitly handling the selected values based on the asset's ID. This change is consistent with the provided summary and does not introduce any issues.


Line range hint 1-196: Overall, the changes in this file look good to me!

The refactoring of the SelectFund component, particularly the modifications to the asset information structure and the handling of selected values, enhances the data representation and improves the clarity and maintainability of the code. The changes are consistent with the provided summary and do not introduce any issues or inconsistencies.

Great work on this refactor! Let me know if you have any further questions or concerns.

src/lib/components/forms/SelectInputBase.tsx (1)

1-207: LGTM!

The SelectInputBase component is well-structured, properly typed, and follows best practices. It effectively uses Chakra UI components and hooks, and is customizable through props. The component correctly handles the selected option state and renders the options and selected option. It also properly handles disabled options and uses memoization to avoid unnecessary re-renders.

Great job on this refactor! The component is now more reusable and maintainable.

src/lib/pages/validator-details/components/tables/voted-proposals/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 168-176: LGTM!

The usage of SelectInputBase for rendering the vote answer filter dropdown looks good:

  • The answerOptions array is correctly passed as the options prop.
  • The handleOnAnswerFilterChange function is correctly passed as the onChange prop to update the selected filter.
  • The answerFilter state variable is passed as the initialSelected prop.
  • The label and popover background colors are customized using the labelBgColor and popoverBgColor props.
  • The disableMaxH prop is set to adjust the popover height behavior.

No issues found.

src/lib/pages/proposal-details/components/vote-details/voting-period/votes-table/index.tsx (2)

6-6: Verify the impact of replacing SelectInput with SelectInputBase.

The change looks good. However, please ensure that replacing SelectInput with SelectInputBase does not introduce any regressions in the filtering mechanism or the overall functionality of the proposal voting table.


Line range hint 193-200: LGTM!

The usage of SelectInputBase component looks correct and is consistent with the import statement change.

src/lib/pages/proposal-details/components/vote-details/voting-period/validator-votes-table/index.tsx (2)

6-6: LGTM!

The change from SelectInput to SelectInputBase aligns with the refactor objectives and is unlikely to introduce any issues.


Line range hint 210-217: Looks good!

The change from SelectInput to SelectInputBase is consistent with the refactor objectives. The usage of ProposalVoteType as a generic type argument and the additional props passed to SelectInputBase are appropriate and unlikely to introduce any issues.

src/lib/components/json-schema/form/fields/MultiSchemaField.tsx (1)

306-306: LGTM!

Passing the readonly prop to the Widget component is consistent with the addition of the prop to the MultiSchemaField component. This change enables control over whether the field can be edited based on the readonly state.

CHANGELOG.md (2)

44-45: Looks good!

The changelog entry concisely captures the essence of the refactor. Nice work!


48-48: LGTM!

The changelog entry provides the right level of detail for the bug fix. Good job capturing the key points.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 12, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@evilpeach evilpeach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unless @songwong commented, others are LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants