Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Failures running tests directly (without coverage command) #20

Open
jstemmer opened this issue Jan 14, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Failures running tests directly (without coverage command) #20

jstemmer opened this issue Jan 14, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@jstemmer
Copy link

Trying to run the tests directly (without using the coverage command) currently fails because unittest.begin() is not a valid method. This should be replaced with with unittest.main().

Fixing this (and running tests standalone) will break one of the formatannotation tests, as the expected result depends on how the tests are run.
@rbtcollins rbtcollins mentioned this issue Mar 24, 2016
Open
rbtcollins added a commit to rbtcollins/funcsigs that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2016
@rbtcollins
Fix aliles#20: setup_requires setuptools 17.1
8ea889a 
That is the release that < in markers started working.

This still gives a poor user experience when an older setuptools is
installed, but at least folk reading setup.py will see the version
they need.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jstemmer