Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: Initial "Scanner" visible check/unchecked state in wrong state #131

Closed
dreamsyntax opened this issue May 12, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #134
Closed

Bug: Initial "Scanner" visible check/unchecked state in wrong state #131

dreamsyntax opened this issue May 12, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #134

Comments

@dreamsyntax
Copy link
Collaborator

The "Scanner" on a fresh install / no config of DME will incorrectly have the Scanner checkbox unchecked while the Scanner is shown, thus clicking it or pressing F3 will need to be done twice to hide it properly.

image

cristian64 added a commit to cristian64/dolphin-memory-engine that referenced this issue May 12, 2024
…nt loop tick.

Previously, the initial size of the main splitter was used to initialize
the checkable action. However, that size is not accurate until the main
window has been shown.

The action is now initialized in the next event loop tick, when the GUI
is ready.

Fixes aldelaro5#131.
cristian64 added a commit to cristian64/dolphin-memory-engine that referenced this issue May 12, 2024
…nt loop tick.

Previously, the initial size of the main splitter was used to initialize
the checkable action. However, that size is not accurate until the main
window has been shown.

The action is now initialized in the next event loop tick, when the GUI
is ready.

Fixes aldelaro5#131.
cristian64 added a commit that referenced this issue May 12, 2024
…nt loop tick.

Previously, the initial size of the main splitter was used to initialize
the checkable action. However, that size is not accurate until the main
window has been shown.

The action is now initialized in the next event loop tick, when the GUI
is ready.

Fixes #131.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant