Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

switch from NEP29 to SPEC0 #369

Closed
orbeckst opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #370
Closed

switch from NEP29 to SPEC0 #369

orbeckst opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #370
Assignees
@orbeckst

Comments

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member

NEP29 is superceded by SPEC 0. We should adopt it officially as there isn't much (anything?) that really changes for us.

Mostly that's a doc change...
@orbeckst orbeckst self-assigned this May 28, 2024
orbeckst added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2024
@orbeckst
adopt SPEC 0 instead of NEP 29
bd650af 
- fix #369
- once this is fixed, we can update the JOSS paper draft PR #328 to only mention
  SPEC 0
@orbeckst orbeckst mentioned this issue May 28, 2024
Merged
orbeckst added a commit that referenced this issue May 29, 2024
@orbeckst
adopt SPEC 0 instead of NEP 29
584588c 
- fix #369
- once this is fixed, we can update the JOSS paper draft PR #328 to only mention
  SPEC 0
orbeckst added a commit that referenced this issue May 29, 2024
@orbeckst
using SPEC 0 (updated from NEP29)
9b2657e 
Changed with #369
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@orbeckst orbeckst

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

adopt SPEC 0 instead of NEP 29 alchemistry/alchemlyb
1 participant
@orbeckst