Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only use parallel version avoidance for significants #183

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2022
Merged

Conversation

ajoberstar
Copy link
Owner

Only if reckoning a significant version should we try to avoid version numbers tagged on parallel branches. This is in line with our
existing documented axioms (which focused on two TAGGED parallel versions).

What this helps with is feature branches where you aren't intending to make a release, and there's more benefit to having the version logically related to what the history of the branch is, rather than assuming the feature branch will eventually conflict and try to eagerly avoid the existing parallel version.

Only if reckoning a significant version should we try to avoid
version numbers tagged on parallel branches. This is in line with our
existing documented axioms (which focused on two TAGGED parallel
versions).

What this helps with is feature branches where you aren't intending to
make a release, and there's more benefit to having the version
logically related to what the history of the branch is, rather than
assuming the feature branch will eventually conflict and try to
eagerly avoid the existing parallel version.
@ajoberstar ajoberstar merged commit 08be355 into main Aug 19, 2022
@ajoberstar ajoberstar deleted the parallel branch August 19, 2022 14:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant