Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PDDL Parsing durative actions costs #598

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

Framba-Luca
Copy link
Contributor

In this PR the PDDLReader also parses DurativeActions with their actions costs and not only InstantaneousActions

@Framba-Luca Framba-Luca self-assigned this Apr 23, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.73684% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.28%. Comparing base (1bea679) to head (c0fb5f6).

Files Patch % Lines
unified_planning/io/pddl_reader.py 91.42% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #598      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.24%   85.28%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         202      202              
  Lines       27205    27245      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits        23192    23237      +45     
+ Misses       4013     4008       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Framba-Luca Framba-Luca force-pushed the durative-action-costs-pddl-parsing branch from 24ac94d to c0fb5f6 Compare April 29, 2024 13:49
@alvalentini alvalentini merged commit ee56971 into master May 6, 2024
10 checks passed
@alvalentini alvalentini deleted the durative-action-costs-pddl-parsing branch May 6, 2024 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants