-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprection Warnings python3.8 event loop #4477
Comments
Hello, it's been fixed in master a while back. |
Can you put out a new release to pypi so we do not have this issue?
…________________________________
From: Sviatoslav Sydorenko <notifications@github.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2019 10:39:20 PM
To: aio-libs/aiohttp <aiohttp@noreply.github.com>
Cc: J.Townsend <townsend891@hotmail.com>; Author <author@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [aio-libs/aiohttp] Deprection Warnings python3.8 event loop (#4477)
Hello, it's been fixed in master a while back.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#4477?email_source=notifications&email_token=AA3V2QRFUDAOQAIGKXPPIZ3Q3PCZRA5CNFSM4KBR7QQKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEH4YKIQ#issuecomment-570000674>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA3V2QQBWH2OZMSAM6ADEZLQ3PCZRANCNFSM4KBR7QQA>.
|
Feel free to backport changes to 3.6 if they aren't there yet |
@L1ghtn1ng are you working on this or can I try making a backport for this? |
You can make a back port for this |
@webknjaz if I were to backport this, should I drop loop kwarg like in #3580 or rather send |
I think just drop kwarg and ping @asvetlov for review. |
Can we re-open this ticket to track the backport status? |
That would be a separate issue or better a PR. I don't see any value in tracking the backport — if somebody is really interested: where's the PR? Besides, nothing in the title or the first post hints the version meaning that having this open would be misleading anyway. |
I assumed from the discussion earlier this week (the day before my previous comment) than a PR would be forthcoming soon. And this is the place that Google search has sent me when I hit exactly this issue, and the 'closed' status was initially surprising. The first post hints that this is a problem with the stable release, because the problem didn't exist in master at the time of the bug report, and nothing in the first post suggested the user wasn't using the (most-obvious path) stable release from PyPI. If one doesn't come up, perhaps I'll put up a PR, but I'm not committing to it at this point as I'll need to work through formal requirements on my end. I assume we're just talking about backporting #4264 though. That was already backported to 3.7 in #4265. The |
The cherry-pick was pretty simple, so the PR's up. |
Is there a timeline for when this fix will be on pypi? |
My PRs have been merged, so this should be fixed in the next aiohttp 3.6 release, whenever that happens. |
That's weird, that's still thrown for me in 3.6.2 |
aiohttp 3.6.2 was released in October 2019. It'll be fixed in the next release. |
I saw this morning that aiophttp==3.6.3 was released this morning! But unfortunately it does not contain a fix to this :( I'm sure it'll happen eventually, I'll be super excited when it does! |
>_< The 3.6.3 release was a quick patch on top of the 3.6.2 release, it didn't include any of the bugfixes from the 3.6 branch since 3.6.2. So hopefully the next 3.6 release. |
@asvetlov thanks for 3.7.1 !!! :) |
Welcome! |
Hi in python3.8 these are the following warning that are generated when creating unit tests in pytest-asyncio
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: