Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update pytest-sugar to 0.9.0 #171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 15, 2017

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Contributor

There's a new version of pytest-sugar available.
You are currently using 0.8.0. I have updated it to 0.9.0

These links might come in handy: PyPI | Changelog | Homepage

Changelog

0.9.0

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  • Print correct location for doctest failures
  • Write xdist output on correct lines

Got merge conflicts? Close this PR and delete the branch. I'll create a new PR for you.

Happy merging! 🤖

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 15, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #171 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #171   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.13%   80.13%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        1299     1299           
  Branches      181      181           
=======================================
  Hits         1041     1041           
  Misses        188      188           
  Partials       70       70

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e5754be...39a0ec1. Read the comment docs.

@asvetlov asvetlov merged commit 7475901 into master Aug 15, 2017
@asvetlov asvetlov deleted the pyup-update-pytest-sugar-0.8.0-to-0.9.0 branch August 15, 2017 21:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants