-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update tutorial.md on links about "entry point" and "plugin" #6095
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @Clarkszw I have some minor requests. But I have to admit I also not very satisfied with my expression 😬 Better have others have another eye on it.
Co-authored-by: Jusong Yu <jusong.yeu@gmail.com>
docs/source/intro/tutorial.md
Outdated
These are ideal for workflows that are not very computationally intensive and can be easily implemented in a Python function. | ||
::: | ||
|
||
Let's run the `WorkChain` above! | ||
|
||
:::{note} | ||
To simplify the basic tutorial, we have left out the steps to register the `MultiplyAddWorkChain` as a plugin which allows us to access the class through the [*entry point*](https://aiida.readthedocs.io/projects/aiida-core/en/latest/topics/plugins.html#topics-plugins-entrypoints) named `core.arithmetic.multiply_add`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is adding the information twice. I would suggest to remove this entire note and mention entry points only after they are used (below)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @unkcpz and @ltalirz for reviewing.
Yes, would love to do. But could you explain me about 'replacing the internal links with references'? |
cannot see preview in github web. Better double check
does not work in conjunction with code-style text
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me now
#4544