[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate

[pre-commit-ci]

updates:

• git://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks → https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks
• github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks: v3.2.0 → v4.5.0
• https://github.com/timothycrosley/isort → https://github.com/PyCQA/isort
• github.com/PyCQA/isort: 5.5.3 → 5.12.0
• github.com/psf/black: 20.8b1 → 23.11.0
• https://gitlab.com/pycqa/flake8 → https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8
• github.com/PyCQA/flake8: 3.8.3 → 6.1.0

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8f61854) 77.83% compared to head (aaed29f) 77.83%.

❗ Current head aaed29f differs from pull request most recent head 5e2e47b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 5e2e47b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #37   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.83%   77.83%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines        2369     2369           
=======================================
  Hits         1844     1844           
  Misses        525      525           

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytests	77.83% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[JPchico]

The tests in this are broken, but this has nothing to do with the changes in this PR and more with the out of date status of the package. What do you think is the best course of action @chrisjsewell . I think merge and then solve any conflicts when pushing the new release. Or one can wait for the new release and the merge this.

[chrisjsewell]

yeh I would just ignore this PR and continue on with getting develop into master