Slim image without fix-permissions on CONDA_DIR

[unkcpz]

see #789

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.22%. Comparing base (94b92f3) to head (ab5b2bc).
Report is 42 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #790   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.22%   68.22%           
=======================================
  Files          45       45           
  Lines        4148     4148           
=======================================
  Hits         2830     2830           
  Misses       1318     1318           

Flag	Coverage Δ
python-3.10	68.22% <ø> (ø)
python-3.9	68.25% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[danielhollas]

If this works let's go for it! In particular, could you test that you can still run conda install and pip install --no-user into the base environment?

I've opened aiidalab/aiidalab-docker-stack#486 for follow-up on aiidalab-docker-stack. Perhaps there are wins to be had there as well!

[unkcpz]

could you test that you can still run conda install and pip install --no-user into the base environment?

Yes, I can run them without problem.