Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decommissioning of old Marist s390x systems #2837

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2022

Conversation

pstankie
Copy link
Contributor

@pstankie pstankie commented Nov 28, 2022

Removes jck-marist-rhel7-s390x-1, jck-marist-ubuntu2004-s390x-1, jck-marist-ubuntu2004-s390x-2 nodes. EF issue #2214 https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/issues/2214

Signed-off-by: Paweł Stankiewicz pawel.stankiewicz@eclipse-foundation.org

Removes jck-marist-rhel7-s390x-1, jck-marist-ubuntu2004-s390x-1, jck-marist-ubuntu2004-s390x-2 nodes.
EF issue adoptium#2214 https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/issues/2214

Signed-off-by: Pawel Stankiewicz <pawel.stankiewicz@eclipse-foundation.org>
Copy link
Contributor

@karianna karianna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@karianna
Copy link
Contributor

karianna commented Dec 5, 2022

GH Actions failing are unrelated

@karianna karianna merged commit a7f75fe into adoptium:master Dec 5, 2022
@sxa
Copy link
Member

sxa commented Dec 5, 2022

@karianna The changes for this need to be deployed onto the machine too. Has that been done?

@sxa
Copy link
Member

sxa commented Dec 5, 2022

Doesn't look like it - have now manually deployed these updates to the configuration.

@karianna
Copy link
Contributor

karianna commented Dec 6, 2022

@sxa Sorry! Thought this was just a doc change? What process should I follow going forwards.

@sxa
Copy link
Member

sxa commented Dec 6, 2022

@sxa Sorry! Thought this was just a doc change? What process should I follow going forwards.

It's a firewall rule change to has to be deployed on jckservices. Which I think is generally lacking in doc to be fair but requires login access to the jckservices system ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants