Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitHub Action to run pyup Safety #601

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

@cclauss cclauss commented Feb 7, 2023

This GitHub Action demonstrates that the version of setuptools in setup-python needs to be upgraded...

-> Vulnerability found in setuptools version 65.5.0
   Vulnerability ID: 52495
   Affected spec: <65.5.1
   ADVISORY: Setuptools 65.5.1 includes a fix for CVE-2022-40897: Python
   Packaging Authority (PyPA) setuptools before 65.5.1 allows remote...
   CVE-2022-40897
   For more information, please visit https://pyup.io/v/52495/f17

 Scan was completed. 1 vulnerability was found. 

Description:
Describe your changes.

Related issue:
Add link to the related issue.

Check list:

  • Mark if documentation changes are required.
  • Mark if tests were added or updated to cover the changes.

This GitHub Action should demonstrate that the version of `setuptools` in `setup-python` needs to be upgraded...
@cclauss cclauss requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2023 18:43
@dmitry-shibanov
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @cclauss. Thank you for your pull request. As I know safety checks python dependencies for vulnerabilities but setup-python does not use python dependencies through dist directory. The action uses python dependencies for e2e testing and unit testing for cache.

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor Author

cclauss commented Feb 8, 2023

Can the version of setuptools that setup-python uses be upgraded so that it does not suffer from CVE-2022-40897?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants